Development and evaluation of ′neck pain and functional limitation scale′: A validation study in the Asian context

Leonard, Joseph H.; Choo, Chan Poh; Manaf, Mohd Rizal Abdul; Isa, Zaleha Md; Nordin, Nor Azlin Mohd; Das, Srijit

doi:10.4103/0019-5359.57645

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The study revealed a good reliability and the strengths of the present study include gold standard translation approach and an excellent sample size. This is also in agreement with the other study conducted by Leonard et al, 32 Adelmanesh et al, 19 Geri et al, 17 and Schmitt et al 16 The results of this study demonstrate that the psychometric properties of the NBQ Iranian translation are sufficiently adequate, thus its use with NP patients.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) is being used widely in various countries. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Persian version of NBQ. Methods: This methodological study investigated 170 patients with chronic neck pain (NP). The psychometric properties of NBQ were evaluated in two stages. First, the standard scale was translated based on Guillemin’s guidelines for cross-cultural adaption and face validity tested in a pilot group (N=25). Second, it was conducted on a sample of 170 diverse chronic pain patients. Construct validity was determined with convergent validity by short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Then, the reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: The instrument demonstrated a good face validity and the participants made minor changes. A slight change was applied on content validity. In construct validity, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.85, which was statistically significant and showed strong correlation. A Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87 was obtained. This confirmed the remarkable internal consistency and stability (0.92). Conclusion: The Persian version of NBQ showed a good internal consistency and reliability and it could be considered as a valuable tool for assessing patients with cervical pain in Iranian population.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From the literature search, we identified 10 questionnaires that are used to assess physical function among people with neck pain [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. They are listed in Table 2.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Content validity was found to be adequate in four questionnaires only: Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire, Neck OutcOme Score, Neck Pain and Functional Limitation Scale, and ProFitMap-neck. When assessing construct validity, we found that factor analysis of the construct to be measured had been Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire [19] Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale [20] Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire [21] Neck Disability Index [22] Neck Pain and Disability Scale [23] Neck Pain and Functional Limitation Scale [24] Neck Functional Status Questionnaire [25] Neck OutcOme Score [26] Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire [27] ProFitMap Neck [28] performed for most questionnaires, and the majority of the studies reported adequate validity. It should be noted, however, that the findings are based on few studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with neck disorders: a systematic review of the literature

Wiitavaara

Heiden

2017

Disability and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The questionnaires differed substantially in items and extent to which their psychometric properties had been evaluated. Focus of measurement was on activities in daily life rather than physical function as such. Implications for Rehabilitation To provide early diagnostics and effective treatment for patients with neck disorders, valid and reliable instruments that measure relevant aspects of the disorders are needed. This paper presents an overview of content and quality of questionnaires used to assess physical function in neck disorders, which may facilitate informed decisions about which measurement instruments to use when evaluating the course of neck disorders. Most of the questionnaires need more testing to judge the quality, however the NDI was the most frequently tested questionnaire. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist is a useful tool in relation to psychometric testing of questionnaires, but clear definitions of interpretation of the quality criteria in each study would enhance comparability of results.

show abstract

“…For concurrent validity, studies in the literature have reported a wide range of correlation results depending on the instruments that were used for comparison. For example, Leonard et al [ 31 ] reported concurrent validity values as high as .91 as the correlation between two instruments measuring functional limitation through pain with the same assessment method. However, medium-high correlations depicting concurrent validity have also been reported: .53 to .64 for the correlation between performance tests and rating scales [ 30 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a core patient-reported-outcome measure set for operationalizing success in multimodal pain therapy: useful for depicting long-term success?

Donath

Geiß

Schön

2018

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe study aims to validate a previously developed and published combined success criterion for patients after multimodal pain therapy (Donath et al., BMC Health Serv Res 15:272, 2015). The criterion classifies treated patients as successful in the long term on the basis of pain severity, disability through pain, depressiveness, and health-related quality of life.MethodsRoutine longitudinal data of 135 pain patients treated with multimodal pain therapy in 2014–2015 at the Interdisciplinary Pain Center of the University Clinic Erlangen were available at baseline, therapy start, therapy end, and 12 months after treatment. Patients were, on average, 51.0 (SD 11.1) years old and to 63.7% female, two thirds were employed (66.7%). We conducted an analysis of concurrent validity (with: pain severity, disability through pain, depressiveness, mental and physical quality of life), criterion validity (with disability days, self-rated success), convergent validity (with stress, anxiety, well-being), and discriminant validity (with chronicity of pain, comorbidity), objectivity, and reliability. Statistically, descriptive and inference statistics, graphical methods and MANOVAs were used.ResultsPatients classified as successful had significantly better values on the 5 variables demonstrating concurrent validity (all p < .001), significantly fewer Disability days (M = 15.31 (SD = 23.15) vs. M = 26.75 (SD = 29.15)); t (133) = 2.308; p = .024, less Anxiety (Pillai-Spur: F (3, 131) = 2.972, p = .034), less Stress (Pillai-Spur: F (3, 131) = 9.907, p < .001), and better Well-being (Pillai-Spur: F (3, 131) = 9.594, p < .001) 12 months after treatment than patients classified as not successful. The Spearman correlation between success classification and Chronicity stage was .094 (p = .280).ConclusionWe demonstrated the validity of the combined success criterion with long-term data in addition to confirming the reliability and objectivity of the criterion. Future research might consider identifying predictors of success in multi-modal pain therapy.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-2911-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Development and evaluation of ′neck pain and functional limitation scale′: A validation study in the Asian context

Cited by 9 publications

References 22 publications

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with neck disorders: a systematic review of the literature

Validation of a core patient-reported-outcome measure set for operationalizing success in multimodal pain therapy: useful for depicting long-term success?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About