2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/robosoft.2018.8404921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and experimental assessment of a flexible robot fin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency metric η, shows that this actuator performs worse than previous prototypes designed exclusively for aquatic locomotion [38], [39], mainly due to reduced force generation. While further optimization of the actuator's morphology, motion planning and control can improve this metric, we recognize that the reduced performance is a tradeoff that enables locomotion in terrestrial conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The efficiency metric η, shows that this actuator performs worse than previous prototypes designed exclusively for aquatic locomotion [38], [39], mainly due to reduced force generation. While further optimization of the actuator's morphology, motion planning and control can improve this metric, we recognize that the reduced performance is a tradeoff that enables locomotion in terrestrial conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…8 in [16], Fig. 7 in [36]), as well as in our experiments as shown in Fig. 2 The paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Design and Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In equation ( 13), all constants are known (as summarized in Table 2), and the coefficient was identified based on the experimental fins' thrust data [10]. A minimal RMS 1 error between the experimental assessment of the fins and the proposed analytical model is obtained for = 0.23.…”
Section: The Proposed Fin Model: a Nonlinear Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%