2004
DOI: 10.1243/095441104322984022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and experimental validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the human scapula

Abstract: A new modelling approach, using a combination of shell and solid elements, has been adopted to develop a realistic three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the human scapula. Shell elements were used to represent a part of the compact bone layer (i.e. the outer cortical layer) and the very thin and rather flat part of the scapula--infraspinous fossa and supraspinous fossa respectively. Solid elements were used to model the remaining part of the compact bone and the trabecular bone. The FE model results i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
51
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6) that could be particularly important when models are used to estimate bone failure behaviour and may improve model sensitivity and specificity. A peak error of 42% represents an improvement with respect to previously published works (Gupta et al, 2004;Keyak et al, 1993;Taddei et al, 2007) but may still seem large. However, this high discrepancy between predicted and measured strains is limited to a few specific locations and is probably due to the impossibility for FE models based on clinical CT data to capture small surface features or discontinuities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6) that could be particularly important when models are used to estimate bone failure behaviour and may improve model sensitivity and specificity. A peak error of 42% represents an improvement with respect to previously published works (Gupta et al, 2004;Keyak et al, 1993;Taddei et al, 2007) but may still seem large. However, this high discrepancy between predicted and measured strains is limited to a few specific locations and is probably due to the impossibility for FE models based on clinical CT data to capture small surface features or discontinuities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…to calibrate HU numbers to r ash with a phantom (or a bone mineral equivalent substance) and then use another relationship to obtain r app (Barker et al, 2005;Dalstra et al, 1995;Keyak et al, 1998Keyak et al, , 2005, or to directly calibrate HU numbers to apparent density. As to the latter case, some studies (Bitsakos et al, 2005;Cody et al, 1999;Gupta et al, 2004;Peng et al, 2006;Taddei et al, 2004) implemented a direct correlation of r app values with HU values, based on the a-priori assumption of at least two HU/r app correspondences (e.g. r app ¼ 0 for HU ¼ 0 and r app ¼ (max estimated cortical density) for HU ¼ (max HU in the dataset)); some other studies do not report sufficient details to replicate the methods used to directly extract r app information from the HU numbers (Gupta et al, 2006;Vazquez et al, 2003;Wagner et al, 2002;Wong et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, biomechanical investigations into phenomena such as the load transfer mechanism across the pelvis and the acetabular reconstruction remain relatively under-investigated as compared to the femoral component. Measurement of such phenomena across the intact and implanted bones would be a useful step forward in the analysis of acetabular failure, and to date this has commonly been evaluated using finite element (FE) analysis [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The validity of the FE model generation process should be assessed using quantitative comparisons between computational predictions and experimental results [Anderson et al, 2007].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these are typically conducted using either skeletal elements with a relatively simple geometric structure (Gross et al, 1997(Gross et al, , 2002Kotha et al, 2004) or in vitro strain data (Gupta et al, 2004). This study represents one of the first validation studies of a geometrically complex skeletal structure using in vivo data collected under naturalistic conditions (Strait et al, 2003.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%