Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Mechanical sand control completions are often used to optimise hydrocarbon production from weak formations. In a few wells this primary sand control method has sub-optimal performance. There is substantial value in remediating some of these wells, but developing this capability is not a quick and simple task. Recompleting a well could be feasible, but is often cost prohibitive. Mechanical solutions could be applied to stem sand production if the sand producing interval is known; however, in some cases chemical sand consolidation is the most effective approach. Chemical sand consolidation works by pumping chemicals downhole to strengthen the formation and stop sanding. In most cases reported in the industry, chemical consolidation has been used in short production intervals (<100m). Our approach was to develop a laboratory programme to test various industry chemicals and to achieve a good understanding of how these can be applied. Candidate wells were matched to chemicals to identify which systems (may be more than one) would be the best fit. The strategy was to initially trial the technology in low-rate onshore wells (typically <1 mmscf/d), before moving progressively to more challenging wells (up to 2,500 bopd). The wells were split into 3 groups based on their complexity: (1) proppant flow back remediation, (2) <100m producing interval and (3) >100m intervals. Each has unique challenges, but this approach facilitated a progressive learning curve. In proppant flow back remediation 7 field applications were conducted with 100% success rate. Longer intervals were successfully treated over time. Matrix consolidation presented a bigger challenge - 10 field trials have been carried out with a mix of successes and failures. A key learning is that adequate placement of the chemicals is critical. Chemical sand consolidation would fulfil its potential only when the chemicals can be reliably delivered to the target sand-producing zone – (often unknown), and remain static to allow sufficient curing time. Some treatments have been bullheaded (i.e pumped down the production tubing); others have been placed with coiled tubing. Operator has successfully developed an organisational capability whereby this technology can be part of the toolkit and - where appropriate - can be applied with a reasonably high chance of success to add value. Wells have been treated in the Lower 48 states in the USA, Canada, Alaska, Azerbaijan and Egypt and other wells are constantly being evaluated. Well types include oil and gas producers, onshore and offshore, with reservoir temperatures from 29 °C to 135°C. This technology is therefore being used across a wide well portfolio.
Mechanical sand control completions are often used to optimise hydrocarbon production from weak formations. In a few wells this primary sand control method has sub-optimal performance. There is substantial value in remediating some of these wells, but developing this capability is not a quick and simple task. Recompleting a well could be feasible, but is often cost prohibitive. Mechanical solutions could be applied to stem sand production if the sand producing interval is known; however, in some cases chemical sand consolidation is the most effective approach. Chemical sand consolidation works by pumping chemicals downhole to strengthen the formation and stop sanding. In most cases reported in the industry, chemical consolidation has been used in short production intervals (<100m). Our approach was to develop a laboratory programme to test various industry chemicals and to achieve a good understanding of how these can be applied. Candidate wells were matched to chemicals to identify which systems (may be more than one) would be the best fit. The strategy was to initially trial the technology in low-rate onshore wells (typically <1 mmscf/d), before moving progressively to more challenging wells (up to 2,500 bopd). The wells were split into 3 groups based on their complexity: (1) proppant flow back remediation, (2) <100m producing interval and (3) >100m intervals. Each has unique challenges, but this approach facilitated a progressive learning curve. In proppant flow back remediation 7 field applications were conducted with 100% success rate. Longer intervals were successfully treated over time. Matrix consolidation presented a bigger challenge - 10 field trials have been carried out with a mix of successes and failures. A key learning is that adequate placement of the chemicals is critical. Chemical sand consolidation would fulfil its potential only when the chemicals can be reliably delivered to the target sand-producing zone – (often unknown), and remain static to allow sufficient curing time. Some treatments have been bullheaded (i.e pumped down the production tubing); others have been placed with coiled tubing. Operator has successfully developed an organisational capability whereby this technology can be part of the toolkit and - where appropriate - can be applied with a reasonably high chance of success to add value. Wells have been treated in the Lower 48 states in the USA, Canada, Alaska, Azerbaijan and Egypt and other wells are constantly being evaluated. Well types include oil and gas producers, onshore and offshore, with reservoir temperatures from 29 °C to 135°C. This technology is therefore being used across a wide well portfolio.
As proppant particles exit fractures during production, the fracture conductivity diminishes with time as the fracture width decreases. This choking effect causes the production of the well to decline, and the high velocity of proppant particles also damages downhole or surface equipment. As a result, proppant flowback causes significant costs resulting from loss of production and equipment damage. Wells experiencing these problems require remediation, ranging from routine wellbore cleanouts to costly artificial lift equipment repairs. A novel, water-based consolidation system has been successfully developed to overcome fluid compatibility, placement, and safety issues during handling and operations, which most current conventional solvent-based resins encounter during field applications. In this system, solvent-based chemicals are replaced with aqueous brines as carriers in the treatment fluid. As a result, aqueous-based resins have high flashpoints, similar to those of water. Additionally, aqueous-based systems are essentially noncombustible and contain no solvent-based resins. They can be foamed, so the operator can bullhead the fluid directly into the wellbore to treat long intervals without zonal isolation packers. The new aqueous-based resins were field tested in Western Desert, Egypt for the first time in 2009. They were developed to provide consolidation for previously placed proppant near the wellbore without damaging the permeability of the proppant pack. Shrouk field wells were hydraulically fractured, and the initial production was approximately 1,000 BOPD. Eventually, the wells began producing proppant, and within three days, proppant flowback destroyed the production pump and eliminated the benefits associated with good wells. Cleaning the wellbore did not prevent the recurrence of proppant flowback, and the cleanup process was repeated several times to maintain well production. Results from field trials showed that this aqueous-based consolidation (ABC) system successfully treated proppant in near-wellbore (NWB) regions, locking them in place without damaging production flow paths. The consolidation treatment transformed the loosely packed proppant in the fractures near the wellbore into cohesive, consolidated packs. In these field tests, intervals in excess of 40 ft were treated effectively with a bullhead squeeze, using consolidation treatment fluids that were foamed to a quality of 75% to aid in diverting treatment fluids and extending treatment volume. This case history presents results of the application of the ABC system to control proppant flowback and to enhance fracture conductivity in Egypt's Western Desert oil fields. This paper presents the results of field applications and discusses the challenges, treatment procedures, and recommendations for applying this newly developed resin. The excellent proppant flowback control reduced remedial work by 95%, and proppant flowback issues were resolved, resulting in significant cost savings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.