“…Coupled with the advent of cheaper monochromatic light sources, i.e., light emitting diodes (LEDs), there has been an explosion in new chemical transformations reported in the literature, from both academia and the pharmaceutical industry. − As these new transformations are implemented into the construction of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), a perennial question arises: how do you scale photochemical transformations? Continuous flow chemistry has received much attention for scaling photochemistry due to the increased surface area to volume ratio which satisfies issues around the penetration of light (Beer–Lambert law) and the intensity of light (Bunsen–Roscoe law). , As intimated above, there are added complexities to reactor design for photochemistry, and both light penetration and the use of heterogeneous catalysis remain unresolved issues when designing reactors. In recent years, different types of reactors have been described in the literature as a solution to performing photochemistry on scale. − These reactors tend to follow a PFR design (Figure a), although the design of immersive modular photoreactors with static mixing has recently been reported to increase mass transfer in the system . There are some exceptions to these examples including the rotor–stator spinning disk reactor, the oscillatory plug flow reactor, the continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR), , the falling film reactor, and a vertical Taylor vortex reactor. , …”