In his best-selling book titled Thinking, Fast and Slow, 1 the Nobel prize laureate Daniel Kahneman explains the 2 systems that drive the way we think and make choices: System One is fast, intuitive, and emotional; System Two is slower, more deliberate, and more logical. Admittedly, there is little in common between the topic of that book and the focus of the current editorial and related original manuscript, which is arrhythmia following the Norwood operation, except for the fact that arrhythmia can be fast and slow. 1 Nonetheless, we as physicians deal with those 2 thinking systems on a daily basis, and although our decisions are largely based on clinical evidence, some are not, and often are triggered by intuition and anecdotal experiences. Those 2 thinking systems come into play again as we evaluate new information offered by a recent study or research and decide whether or not to adapt any changes in our management strategy.In the current issue of the Journal, Oster and colleagues 2 reviewed the data from the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial (SVR Trial) and examined the incidence and risk factors associated with arrhythmias following the Norwood operation and the implication of those postoperative arrhythmias on outcomes. They found that among the 544 patients in their study cohort, 114 (21%) experienced at least 1 episode of postoperative tachyarrhythmia, and 21 (4%) experienced at least 1 episode of postoperative atrioventricular block. They also found that although all postoperative arrhythmias were associated with prolonged recovery, only atrioventricular block was associated with diminished transplant-free survival. 2 Tachyarrhythmia was not infrequent in this study, and was associated with prolonged recovery, although not with diminished survival. 2 Conclusions from this study, though, are restricted by several limitations. The etiology of tachyarrhythmia is unclear and can be multifactorial, related to metabolic, anatomic, surgical, and demographic factors. 3 Additionally, various types of arrhythmias can be difficult to distinguish and are often associated with different provoking factors. Finally, there are great variations in the threshold to treat and the mode of treatment of tachyarrhythmia episodes among institutions and possibly within the same institution. The information provided by the study by Oster and colleagues 2 suggests that a prophylactic medical treatment in the perioperative period that could successfully decrease the incidence of tachyarrhythmia would be beneficial by decreasing mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit times, with potential subsequent reduction of hospital-related complications and morbidity. In the adult population, prophylactic use of antiarrhythmic agents has been well studied and proved to be successful in decreasing morbidity and resource utilization. 4 Prophylactic use of antiarrhythmic agents in the pediatric population has been much less studied, and an evidence of the benefit of such a practice does not exist in the heter...