Development and impact of the Iranian hospital performance measurement program

Abstract

BackgroundIran developed a national hospital performance measurement program (HPMP) which has been implemented annually throughout its hospitals since 1997. However, little is known yet about its development and the impact of the program on hospital performance.This study aims to describe the development and process of implementation of the HPMP, and to explore the impact on hospital performance by looking at the trends of performance scores of all different types of Iranian hospitals.MethodsThis was a mixed method study consisting of longitudinal data and qualitative document analysis. Hospital performance data over the period of 2002 to 2008 was analysed.ResultsIran instituted a comprehensive HPMP and implemented it in all hospitals since 1997. The program followed a phased development to stimulate performance and quality improvement in hospitals. Overall, the program has had a positive impact on the performance of general and specialized hospitals. The performance of general hospitals did not appear to be associated with their size or affiliated university ranking. However, the rate of performance improvement of general teaching and private hospitals was significantly lower than the average improvement rate of all general hospitals. There was no relationship between teaching status of the specialized hospitals and their level of performance. However, the performance of the governmental specialized hospitals showed a substantial decline over time. Moreover, among specialized hospitals, the bigger sized and those affiliated with higher ranked universities, reported better performance.ConclusionsOverall, the development and implementation of an obligatory HPMP in Iran has improved the level of performance in general and specialized hospitals. However, there is room for further performance improvement especially in the general teaching, private, and governmental specialized hospitals. Reconsidering the ownership type, funding mechanisms and responsibility for the HPMP may have an impact on the absolute level of performance and improvement capacity of hospitals. In addition, the role and composition of survey teams, mechanism of implementation according to the characteristics of hospitals, and updating standards are important factors to promote performance improvement and hospital accreditation requirements.

Healthcare Providers’ Knowledge and Current Practice of Pain Assessment and Management: How Much Progress Have We Made?

“…A study in Lebanon showed that accreditation improved quality of health care, particularly in documentation and translating theories into actions [56]. Aghaei Hashjin et al reported an improvement in the performances of hospitals in Iran following implementation of a performance measuring program [57]. Moreover, auditing and monitoring coupled with education improved pain assessment and management in Canadian paediatric hospital [55].…”

Factors affecting the quality of hospital hotel services from the patients and their companions' point of view: A national study in Iran

“…Although hospitals make efforts regarding administrative processes in relation to the provision of services from admission to discharge to use specific strategies to accelerate the process, in practice, many of these processes are not optimal and are sometimes far from that expected. [182829] Some researchers reported patient satisfaction from the hospital general services to be at a lower level compared to the medical and nursing services. [30] A meta-analysis study regarding the satisfaction of patients toward hospital emergency centers in Iran showed that patients’ satisfaction scores ranged from 24 to 98.4 with an average of 68.9% and is somewhat acceptable.…”

Relationship between Quality of the Referral Chain of Hospital Services and Patient Satisfaction

“…Two questionnaires were used in this study: To design quality supply chain questionnaire firstly, based primarily on studies that had been done in the field, the supply chain quality dimensions were identified (Stanley & Wisner, 2001;Ajam et al, 2013;Chu-Hua & Madu, 2001;Azar & Mohamadlu, 2010;Hashjin et al, 2014;Kuei & Madu, 2001;Schneller, 2000;Stank et al, 2005;Power, 2005;Chen et al, 2013) and then given to the specialists in this field to prove its validity. In order to measure patient satisfaction on received services, the designed Questionnaire in the Assessment of health reform system in the field of treatment in September 2014 was used (Ministry of Health and Medical Education, 2014) and according to the research goals, the items were adjusted, the study data were collected based on the Likert scale was arranged (5 options), and open questions.…”