2008
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and implementation of a molecular diagnostic platform for daily rapid detection of 15 respiratory viruses

Abstract: Acute respiratory tract infections are caused by a large number of viruses. Diagnostic methods have until recently been available only for a limited number of these viruses. With the objective to achieve sensitive assays for all respiratory viruses, a rational workflow in the laboratory, and a short turn-around time, a real-time PCR diagnostic platform for daily rapid detection of 15 respiratory viruses was developed. The system was evaluated on 585 stored nasopharyngeal aspirates from hospitalized children. P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
107
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We report an outbreak of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) infections in Stockholm, Sweden in late August and September of 2016 caused by the newly described B3 lineage [1]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report an outbreak of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) infections in Stockholm, Sweden in late August and September of 2016 caused by the newly described B3 lineage [1]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were stored at 6°C–8°C during the day of sampling and subsequently frozen at −80°C. After thawing, a standardised real-time PCR assay was performed for the following 15 viruses at the accredited (ISO 15189:2012) Microbiological Laboratory at Karolinska University Hospital: HAdV, HBoV, HCoV (species HKU1, NL63, OC43 and 229E), EV, Flu (A, A(H1N1)pdm09 and B), hMPV, PIV 1–3, rhinovirus (RV), RSV (A and B) 18. Single agent real-time PCRs were used for most viruses, nevertheless duplex real-time PCRs were used for PIV 1 and 3, for PIV 2 and HCoV 229E and for RSV A and B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An immunofluorescence test for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) on a nasopharyngeal sample made at the secondary hospital was negative. A tracheal aspirate sample, drawn on the first day of ECMO treatment, was tested for atypical bacterial agents and 15 respiratory viruses by hydrolysis probe-based realtime PCR (11). It was negative for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, adenovirus, coronaviruses (229E, HKU1, NL63, and OC43), enteroviruses, influenza A and B, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza viruses 1 to 3, rhinoviruses, and RSV.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%