2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and implementation of an algorithm for detection of protein complexes in large interaction networks

Abstract: Background: After complete sequencing of a number of genomes the focus has now turned to proteomics. Advanced proteomics technologies such as two-hybrid assay, mass spectrometry etc. are producing huge data sets of protein-protein interactions which can be portrayed as networks, and one of the burning issues is to find protein complexes in such networks. The enormous size of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks warrants development of efficient computational methods for extraction of significant complexe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
181
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
181
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of comparing ModuleSearch with other programs, we tested InterViewer (Han and Ju 2003;Cui et al 2008), CFinder (Adamcsek et al 2007), MCODE (Bader and Hogue 2003), IPCA (Li et al 2008) and DPClus (Altaf-Ul-Amin et al 2006) on the yeast protein -protein interaction data, and selected the modules with 3-20 proteins. InterViewer found 116 modules, and 111 of them range from 3 to 20.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the purpose of comparing ModuleSearch with other programs, we tested InterViewer (Han and Ju 2003;Cui et al 2008), CFinder (Adamcsek et al 2007), MCODE (Bader and Hogue 2003), IPCA (Li et al 2008) and DPClus (Altaf-Ul-Amin et al 2006) on the yeast protein -protein interaction data, and selected the modules with 3-20 proteins. InterViewer found 116 modules, and 111 of them range from 3 to 20.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPCA (Li et al 2008) finds overlapping subgraphs from a protein-protein interaction network using the diameter and density of sub-graphs, but generates a large number of sub-graphs that are slightly different from each other by one or two proteins. DPClus (Altaf-Ul-Amin et al 2006) allows the user to find either overlapping or non-overlapping protein complexes from a proteinprotein interaction network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction-based approaches such as topological analysis (e.g., shortest path search Yu et al, 2014, centrality analysis Carrera et al, 2009, and network module detection Altaf-Ul-Amin et al, 2006), correlation network analysis (Provart, 2012), or enrichment analysis (Hung et al, 2012) have been used to construct and analyze biological networks from omics data. For example, GeneMANIA (Montojo et al, 2010; Zuberi et al, 2013) is a web-based interaction network for the visualization of physical, genetic, and functional interactions.…”
Section: Network Visualization and Pathway Analysis Tools For Interacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amin et al develops a cluster periphery tracking algorithm (DPclus) to locate protein complexes by keeping seeking the periphery of a detected cluster. 8 Limin et al improves the DPclus to mine protein complexes with two topological constraints and reduces the number of parameters in the algorithm IPCA. 9 Based on both graph-theoretical and gene-ontological properties, King et al proposes the restricted neighbors searching clustering (RNSC) to detect protein complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%