Development and initial validation of the Influences on Patient Safety Behaviours Questionnaire

Taylor, Natalie; Parveen, Sahdia; Robins, Victoria; Slater, Beverley; Lawton, Rebecca

doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-81

Cited by 50 publications

(72 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These results correspond with Taylor et al [36,63] who found good discriminant validity of TDF domains in a questionnaire measuring influences on patient safety behaviors [36] and in the Determinants of Physical Activity Questionnaire [63]. While Taylor et al [36,63] used specific items ( i.e. , related to a specific application), our items are generic and allow for application within a range of different contexts in which implementation research takes place.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To improve the implementation of innovations in healthcare settings, it is important to understand factors influencing healthcare professionals' behaviors. We aimed to develop a generic questionnaire in English and in Dutch assessing the 14 domains of behavioral determinants from the revised TDF (Cane et al., 2012) that can be tailored to suit different targets, actions, contexts, and times of interest, and to investigate questionnaire items' discriminant content validity. Methods: We identified existing questionnaires including items assessing constructs within TDF domains and developed new items where needed. Nineteen judges allocated 79 items to one or more TDF domains. Onesample t-tests were used to examine the discriminant content validity of each item, i.e., whether items measured intended domains or whether items measured a combination of domains.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At the time of writing the questionnaire, the TDF had only been applied in two quantitative studies [40,41] and demonstrated varying degrees of internal consistency in domains and either one [41] (propensity to act) or three [40] (capability, opportunity, motivation) factor explanatory models. Subsequent quantitative applications [22,52,53] have shown good discriminant validity, collated a wider array of domain items, and demonstrated levels of internal consistency similar to our findings.…”

Section: Study Strengthssupporting

confidence: 82%

Patient-, organization-, and system-level barriers and facilitators to preventive oral health care: a convergent mixed-methods study in primary dental care

2017

Br Dent J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ‘nature of the behaviour’ domain was also excluded; Michie et al . explain that this domain is accorded to a different order as it describes the dependent variable, in this case, taking medicines as prescribed . It is therefore not treated as a domain of behaviour change, but its constructs such as habits were considered throughout the mapping task.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to medication adherence in patients prescribed medicines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a conceptual framework

Easthall

Taylor

Bhattacharya

2018

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To identify barriers to medication adherence in patients prescribed medicines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and map these to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), to produce a conceptual framework for developing a questionnaire‐based medication adherence tool. Methods A scoping review of barriers to medication adherence in long‐term conditions was conducted to generate an initial pool of barriers. After preliminary mapping to the TDF, these barriers were presented to two focus groups of patients prescribed medicines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (n = 14) to stimulate discussion. The group discussions enabled the patients’ interpretations of the adherence barriers to be determined, provided validity from the patient perspective and identified additional barriers unrepresented in the scoping review. Key findings The preliminary pool of adherence barriers was identified from 47 studies across a range of long‐term conditions. The majority of TDF domains were represented by these literature‐identified barriers except ‘social/professional role and identity’ and ‘behavioural regulation’. Barrier mapping was largely endorsed by focus group participants, who also contributed additional barriers, including those relating to not having a ‘system’ in place for managing their medicines and the negative emotions evoked by medicine taking. Conclusion The TDF enabled full exploration of adherence barriers including those relating to emotions which have received limited attention in the literature. This work has provided a conceptual framework for developing a questionnaire to identify an individual's adherence barriers which may then be coupled with appropriate behaviour change techniques to deliver a theory‐based intervention tailored for individual need.

show abstract

Development and initial validation of the Influences on Patient Safety Behaviours Questionnaire

Cited by 50 publications

References 32 publications

Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research

Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research

Patient-, organization-, and system-level barriers and facilitators to preventive oral health care: a convergent mixed-methods study in primary dental care

Barriers to medication adherence in patients prescribed medicines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a conceptual framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About