2013
DOI: 10.1177/1069072712475281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Initial Validation of the Willingness to Compromise Scale

Abstract: This study introduced an individual difference construct of willingness to compromise and examined its implications for understanding and predicting career-related decisions in work settings. In Study 1 (N ¼ 53), critical incidents of career decisions were analyzed to identify commonalities across different types of career-related compromises. In Study 2 (N ¼ 171), an initial 17-item scale was developed and revised. In Study 3 (N ¼ 201), the convergent and criterion-related validity of the scale was examined i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We coded all items so that higher total scores represented a greater willingness to compromise. Wee (2013) reported an α of .77 and supported construct validity by finding positive associations between the scale and career adaptability. The α value in our study was .76.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We coded all items so that higher total scores represented a greater willingness to compromise. Wee (2013) reported an α of .77 and supported construct validity by finding positive associations between the scale and career adaptability. The α value in our study was .76.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Compared to making decisions that satisfy, decisions that maximize require more time, effort, and consideration and are more likely to involve active coping strategies (Schwartz et al, 2002). Consistent with this, decisions that maximize, for example, lead to more successful career outcomes (Iyengar, Wells, & Schwartz, 2006), generate more commitment to the goal on the part of the decision maker (Sparks, Ehrlinger, & Eibach, 2012), and are less likely to involve compromise (Wee, 2013). As individuals with “a clear and stable picture of [their] goals, interests, and talents”—that is, a more well-developed vocational identity (Holland et al, 1980, p. 1191)—are in a better position to, and more likely to want to, maximize their outcomes than those with a less well-developed identity, they will put more time and energy into their decisions and will be less likely to compromise on them.…”
Section: Vocational Identitymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We measured resistance to change, a construct that has been found to differentiate between liberals and conservatives (Jost et al, 2003). The measure was adapted from the Willingness to Compromise Scale (Wee, 2013), and was computed as the average response to the 3-item scale ("I would stick to my beliefs even when others might think that they are not reasonable. ", "Reality constraints should not stand in the way of one's beliefs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%