2017
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1303776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Initial Validation of the Five-Factor Model Adolescent Personality Questionnaire (FFM–APQ)

Abstract: This research reports on the 4-phase development of the 25-item Five-Factor Model Adolescent Personality Questionnaire (FFM-APQ). The purpose was to develop and determine initial evidence for validity of a brief adolescent personality inventory using a vocabulary that could be understood by adolescents up to 18 years old. Phase 1 (N = 48) consisted of item generation and expert (N = 5) review of items; Phase 2 (N = 179) involved item analyses; in Phase 3 (N = 496) exploratory factor analysis assessed the under… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The FFM structure was partly recovered in the present sample of Spanish adolescents using ESEM, as openness did not emerge as a well-defined factor in this study. The results on the item-level analyses of the FFM structure obtained in this study replicate other findings reported in adolescents (e.g., Rogers & Glendon, 2018; Soto et al, 2008; Vollrath et al, 2016). Overall, in line with studies on FFM measures, an ESEM model fit the data better than an ICM-CFA and had a similar fit to the original scale (Morizot, 2014) and the Spanish version in adults of the BFPTSQ (Mezquita et al, 2019; Ortet et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FFM structure was partly recovered in the present sample of Spanish adolescents using ESEM, as openness did not emerge as a well-defined factor in this study. The results on the item-level analyses of the FFM structure obtained in this study replicate other findings reported in adolescents (e.g., Rogers & Glendon, 2018; Soto et al, 2008; Vollrath et al, 2016). Overall, in line with studies on FFM measures, an ESEM model fit the data better than an ICM-CFA and had a similar fit to the original scale (Morizot, 2014) and the Spanish version in adults of the BFPTSQ (Mezquita et al, 2019; Ortet et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These challenging results in relation to openness are rather usual in the construction of FFM measures in adolescents. Openness is the most controversial and difficult factor to recover during this developmental stage in comparison to the other four factors (Rogers & Glendon, 2018). Soto et al (2008) also showed that openness is arguably the most problematic factor of the FFM, particularly with early adolescents, in part because many openness items tend to be unfamiliar or more difficult to understand for younger adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48% female and 52% male students mostly pursuing university degree studies (82%) while 15% are in pre-university or below and 3% pursing their master's degree (see Table 1). Measurements: FFM was measured replicating Rogers and Glendon [45] with 25 items (also presented in Appendix). Each item was measured with a 5-point Likert scale (1: "strongly disagree" to 5: "strongly agree").…”
Section: Mediating Role Of Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it can be linked to the employee personality as a social factor that can influence the atmosphere and beyond. According to Rogers and Glendon (2018), there is a well-studied and frequently employed approach to comprehending and classifying variations in personality which is the Five Factor Model (FFM). The five factors of personality are usually referred to as Agreeableness, Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience (Rogers and Glendon, 2018).…”
Section: Social Factormentioning
confidence: 99%