2015
DOI: 10.1111/jan.12741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and initial validation of the Parental PELICAN Questionnaire (PaPEQu) – an instrument to assess parental experiences and needs during their child's end‐of‐life care

Abstract: The Parental PELICAN Questionnaire holds promise as a measure to assess parental experiences and needs and is applicable to a broad range of paediatric specialties and settings. Future validation is needed to evaluate its suitability in different cultures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All selected quotes were translated to English and the accuracy of the translation was verified by the co‐authors. Evidence of initial validity and reliability of the PaPEQu was demonstrated and published elsewhere (Zimmermann et al., ).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All selected quotes were translated to English and the accuracy of the translation was verified by the co‐authors. Evidence of initial validity and reliability of the PaPEQu was demonstrated and published elsewhere (Zimmermann et al., ).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Quantitative data on parental experiences and needs were obtained through the Parental PELICAN Questionnaire (PaPEQu), which was specifically developed and validated for the PELICAN II main study (Zimmermann et al., ). The questionnaire was structured according to six quality domains of family‐centred EOL care and comprised approximately 90 items.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and different types of potential responses or involvement (i.e., calling the police, scolding or reprehending the aggressor, protecting the woman victim, ignoring the situation, doing nothing, etc.). The initial pool of items was then reviewed by a panel of six experts on IPVAW to establish construct representativeness and clarity ( Beck and Gable, 2001 ; Delgado-Rico et al, 2012 ). The experts were asked to rate the representativeness (i.e., whether the item is suitable to measure willingness to intervene in cases of IPVAW), and the clarity (i.e., how concise the item is) of the items on a 7-point Likert-type scale (1 = “Very unrepresentative/unclear”; 7 = “Very representative/clear”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, the item count ranged from 91 to 95, with the addition of 13 socio-demographic items. Initial validity and reliability of the PaPEQu has been demonstrated and reported along with a detailed description of its development [20]. In this study only the 34 needs-related items representing the six evidence-based quality domains were used and analysed for gender-specific differences, as well as 7 socio-demographic items.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%