2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire

Abstract: Misophonia is characterized by decreased tolerance and accompanying defensive motivational system responding to certain aversive sounds and contextual cues associated with such stimuli, typically repetitive oral (e. g., eating sounds) or nasal (e.g., breathing sounds) stimuli. Responses elicit significant psychological distress and impairment in functioning, and include acute increases in (a) negative affect (e.g., anger, anxiety, and disgust), (b) physiological arousal (e.g., sympathetic nervous system activa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
4
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coping behaviour is one of the omitted dimensions that warrants further investigation in future research. Individuals with misophonia described a range of coping strategies in their feedback during our first two waves of development, which is consistent with previous research [4], with the consensus definition [2], and with the recently published Duke misophonia questionnaire [58]. However, these behaviour items did not meaningfully load onto the model in the present study.…”
Section: The S-five In the Context Of The Consensus Definition Of Misophoniasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Coping behaviour is one of the omitted dimensions that warrants further investigation in future research. Individuals with misophonia described a range of coping strategies in their feedback during our first two waves of development, which is consistent with previous research [4], with the consensus definition [2], and with the recently published Duke misophonia questionnaire [58]. However, these behaviour items did not meaningfully load onto the model in the present study.…”
Section: The S-five In the Context Of The Consensus Definition Of Misophoniasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Many different measures have been developed and used in past years—most notably the A-MISO-S (Schröder et al, 2013 ) and Misophonia Questionnaire (MQ; Wu et al, 2014 )—and keep being introduced in the misophonia literature (e.g., more recently the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire by Rosenthal et al, 2021 ). We hope that our findings about how the MisoQuest behaves in our online community sample can reveal how this measure relates to other scales assessing misophonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the scarcity of studies, in recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of studies. The reasons for their growing interest were: (1) the need to recognize that there are stimuli that may seem harmless to the general population, but that, nevertheless, in some people cause severe symptoms that considerably affect their lifestyle [ 2 , 6 , 20 , 29 ]; (2) the importance of correctly diagnosing the disorder without the risk of being confused with other similar conditions; [ 5 , 20 , 34 , 83 ]; and (3) the existing insufficiency of effective treatments that can be validated to treat the symptoms of misophonia [ 88 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) Duke Misophonia Questionnaire (DMQ) is a broad scale with subscales. Depending on the needs, it can be applied in its entirety or only to the individual subscales [ 83 ]. (9) The first child/adolescent scale for misophonia Sussex Myofonia Scale for Adolescents SMS Adolescent [ 84 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%