Development and pilot testing of the collaborative practice assessment tool

Abstract

Collaborative practice is receiving increased attention as a model of healthcare delivery that positively influences the effectiveness and efficiency of patient care while improving the work environment of healthcare providers. The collaborative practice assessment tool (CPAT) was developed from the literature to enable interprofessional teams to assess their collaborative practice. The CPAT survey included 56 items across nine domains including: mission and goals; relationships; leadership; role responsibilities and autonomy; communication; decision-making and conflict management; community linkages and coordination; perceived effectiveness and patient involvement; in addition to three open-ended questions. The tool was developed for use in a variety of settings involving a diversity of healthcare providers with the aim of helping teams to identify professional development needs and corresponding educational interventions. The results of two pilot tests indicated that the CPAT is a valid and reliable tool for assessing levels of collaborative practice within teams. This article describes the development of the tool, the pilot testing and validation process, as well as limitations of the tool.

The Modified Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale in Currently Practicing Athletic Trainers

“…1,18 Before IPP can successfully occur in the workforce, health care practitioners must learn interprofessionally. These IPE experiences can occur precertification or postcertification as part of the CEUs many health care professions require to maintain certification.…”

Interprofessional Education and Practice in Athletic Training

“…It has been suggested that interprofessional collaboration in practice may improve patient care and outcomes, reduce medical errors, and enhance job satisfaction and retention. 29 Therefore, the next generation of health professionals must be prepared to successfully function in this culture. Various entities have suggested that the preparation of the health care workforce should include IPE, 24,30 and have identified health care competencies for all health care providers, regardless of discipline.…”

Mapping Collective Sensemaking in Communication: The Interprofessional Patient Case Review in Acute Care Rounds

“…Opie (1997Opie ( , 2000 calls this discursive knowledge work, 1 and communication can be considered the interprofessional practice itself. One of this article's main contributions is its suggestion that the interprofessional patient case review-as communicative practice-should serve as a site for inquiry into ICP, as it is here that shared mental models, shared goals, and role and situation awareness are brought to life (Atwal & Caldwell, 2006;Billett, 2014;Evans & Baker, 2012;San Martín-Rodríguez, Beaulieu, D' Amour, & FerradaVidela, 2005;Schroder et al, 2011;Suter et al, 2009 Communication.…”