2010
DOI: 10.1002/lary.21095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and pilot testing of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) on hoarseness

Abstract: This OSCE can be effectively used for the objective assessment of clinical competency in hoarseness. Our pilot study evaluated multiple competencies on a single occasion, including medical knowledge, patient care, professionalism, and communication and interpersonal skills. Clinical competence in history taking, physical examination, flexible fiber-optic laryngoscopy, and ability to interpret radiologic findings improved with increasing year of training. This OSCE provides targeted assessment of practice-based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Several reports have evaluated the feasibility, reliability, and validity of using OSce in the medical and surgical fields. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] in reported experiences with OSce, various formats have included a combination of methods including written problem-solving stations, 15 standardized patients, [14][15][16]20 handson stations requiring demonstration of technical skills, or interpretation of laboratory results. 20 These differences in format and content target various objectives expected of diverse groups of trainees.…”
Section: Osce In Medical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 Several reports have evaluated the feasibility, reliability, and validity of using OSce in the medical and surgical fields. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] in reported experiences with OSce, various formats have included a combination of methods including written problem-solving stations, 15 standardized patients, [14][15][16]20 handson stations requiring demonstration of technical skills, or interpretation of laboratory results. 20 These differences in format and content target various objectives expected of diverse groups of trainees.…”
Section: Osce In Medical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OSce was found to be a reliable tool to assess physical examination skills, 18,19 clinical judgment and diagnosis, 15,20 interpretation of radiological and laboratory findings, 20 technical skills, [17][18][19][20] and even billing and documentation exercises. 16 communication skills, such as end-of-life decisions, disclosure of medical errors, 14,21 and patient feedback, 16 have also been assessed.…”
Section: Osce In Medical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video assessments are well‐documented tools for improving clinical skills and interactions as well as surgical skills . Traditional methods of training medical students and residents in clinical competence include objective structured clinical examinations and video recordings of interactions with either standardised patients or live patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video assessments are well-documented tools for improving clinical skills and interactions as well as surgical skills. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Traditional methods of training medical students and residents in clinical competence include objective structured clinical examinations and video recordings of interactions with either standardised patients or live patients. Primary care training programs and medical schools have found video technology useful for selfassessment and teaching communication and interpersonal skills in simulated and live patient encounters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A division into five OSCE stations was introduced: auscultation of the heart and pulse rate, non- This process was intended to ensure that the tasks were appropriate to the student syllabus and whether they rated/checked what we wanted to assess with proper accuracy (its reliability). The panel of experts also assessed the consistency of the checklists used (28,29).…”
Section: Objective Structured Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%