2018
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Job Demands in Nursing Scale and Job Resources in Nursing Scale: Results from a national study

Abstract: Aim To develop and test the psychometric properties of the Job Resources in Nursing (JRIN) Scale and the Job Demands in Nursing (JDIN) Scale. Design Cross‐sectional survey. Methods A three‐phase process of instrument development and psychometric evaluation was employed: Phase 1: development of a 42‐item JRIN Scale and 60‐item JDIN Scale through extensive literature review, expert consultation and an iterative content evaluation; Phase 2: pilo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two practice variables were perceived work confidence and perceived work competence, both measured on a Likert scale (extremely low, somewhat low, somewhat high, extremely high). The five workplace variables were three subscales from the Job Resources in Nursing (JRIN) Scale (Penz et al 2019) measuring practice resources related to supervision, recognition and feedback (four items); staffing and time (four items); and autonomy and control (four items) and two subscales from the Job Demands in Nursing (JDIN) Scale (Penz et al 2019) measuring demands related to isolation (three items) and comfort with working conditions (four items). The JRIN and JDIN subscales were each measured on a five-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree).…”
Section: Variables Included In the Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two practice variables were perceived work confidence and perceived work competence, both measured on a Likert scale (extremely low, somewhat low, somewhat high, extremely high). The five workplace variables were three subscales from the Job Resources in Nursing (JRIN) Scale (Penz et al 2019) measuring practice resources related to supervision, recognition and feedback (four items); staffing and time (four items); and autonomy and control (four items) and two subscales from the Job Demands in Nursing (JDIN) Scale (Penz et al 2019) measuring demands related to isolation (three items) and comfort with working conditions (four items). The JRIN and JDIN subscales were each measured on a five-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree).…”
Section: Variables Included In the Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three subscales of the Job Resources in Nursing (JRIN) Scale and 1 subscale of the Job Demands in Nursing Scale (JDIN) were included in this analysis [51]. The 3 JRIN subscales (staffing and time; technology; and training, professional development, and continuing education) and 1 JDIN subscale (preparedness/scope of practice) each consisted of 4 items that were scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with subscale scores ranging from 4 to 20 and higher scores indicating a higher perceived level of the resource or demand (some JDIN-preparedness items required reverse scoring).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to our conceptual model, measures of education/experience included four variables: the total number of rural communities worked in for 3 months or longer (1–3, 4–6, 7–9 and ≥10 communities), highest level of nursing education attained (bachelor’s degree vs. other), duration of time with primary employer and years since first registered to practice in Canada. Thirteen measures in the category of rural work environment were examined in this analysis: job resources (24 items on a five‐point Likert scale) (Penz et al, ), job demands (22 items on a five‐point Likert scale) (Penz et al, ), total number of disciplines represented in their professional support network (e.g., LPNs, RNs, RPNs, NPs, physicians), interprofessional collaboration (able to share and exchange ideas in a team discussion on a seven‐point Likert scale from not at all to a very great extent) (King, Shaw, Orchard, & Miller, ) and frequency of use of online/electronic information sources to make decisions in practice (six‐point Likert scale from never to daily ). Rural work environment variables also consisted of most often work day shift (yes or no), level of development of competence in rural nursing practice ( novice , developing , accomplished or expert ), the total number of leadership activities in which they were involved, shift length worked most often (≤8 hr vs. 12 hr), perceived scope of practice (below/within scope vs. beyond scope), required to be on‐call (yes or no), had experienced emotional abuse (yes or no) or had experienced physical assault (yes or no) at work within the past 4 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to our conceptual model, measures of education/experience included four variables: the total number of rural communities worked in for 3 months or longer (1-3, 4-6, 7-9 and ≥10 communities), highest level of nursing education attained (bachelor's degree vs. other), duration of time with primary employer and years since first registered to practice in Canada. Thirteen measures in the category of rural work environment were examined in this analysis: job resources (24 items on a five-point Likert scale) (Penz et al, 2018), job demands (22 items on a five-point Likert scale) (Penz et al, 2018), total number of disciplines represented in their professional support network (e.g., LPNs, RNs, RPNs, NPs, physicians), interprofessional collaboration (able to share and exchange ideas in a team discussion on a seven-point Likert scale from not at all to a very great extent) (King, Shaw, Orchard, & Miller, 2010) and frequency of use of online/electronic information sources to make decisions in practice (six-point Likert scale…”
Section: Instruments/measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%