Development and psychometric evaluation of Nurses and Midwives’ Perceptions of their Roles in Primary Healthcare

Al‐Dwaikat, Tariq; Ta’an, Wafa’a; Alrawashdeh, Mohammad; Baker, Nesrin Abu; Ali, Nahla Mansour Al

doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.09.009

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, items 13 and 14 were loaded on components 2 and 3. According to Al-Dwaikat et al [27], if an item is loaded into two diferent domains, these items can be removed as it creates confusion in labeling all factors that share similar variables. However, Nunnally and Bernstein [24] argued that if items are loaded in at least two factors, they can be kept in the factor they had strong association.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Russian Version of the Leading a Culture of Quality in Infection Prevention Scale among Nurses in Kazakhstan

Cruz,

Colet,

Almazan

et al. 2023

Journal of Nursing Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Worldwide, hospitals are required to prioritize the culture of quality in infection prevention (CQIP) for patient safety. Assessing CQIP is crucial, but there is limited research, especially regarding nurses’ perceptions. Insufficient information exists due to scarcity of validated instruments in local languages to measure CQIP internationally. Purpose. This study assessed the “Leading a Culture of Quality in Infection Prevention Scale” Russian version’s (LCQ-IPS-R) validity and reliability to assess the CQIP of hospitals in Kazakhstan based on nurses’ perceptions. Methods. This study utilized a methodological design and analyzed data from 204 nurses at the “National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health” in Astana City, Kazakhstan. The “cultural and linguistic adaptation” process involved a “forward-backward translation” technique. Content validity and construct validity were examined. Internal consistency reliability was explored for scale reliability. Results. The scale’s mean item range was from 3.56 (SD = 1.22) to 4.40 (SD = 0.85; SD = 0.92). The corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.321 to 0.707. Six experts rated the I-CVI from 0.83 to 1.00, with an S-CVI/Ave of 0.90. The principal component analysis with Varimax rotation produced four distinct components of the LCQ-IPS-R, explaining 69.8% of the total variance. The tests of correlation between the LCQ-IPS-R’s four components revealed medium to large positive associations among the components (r = 0.25–0.55, p < 0.001 ). The computed α for the LCQ-IPS-R was 0.909 while α values from four subscales ranged from 0.809 to 0.921. Conclusions/Implications for Practice. This study provides evidence of the LCQ-IP-R’s reliability and validity in evaluating Russian-speaking nurses’ perception of their hospital’s CQIP. These findings open the door for further research on CQIP in healthcare settings in Kazakhstan, Central Asia, and other Russian-speaking countries. The scale provides essential baseline information to design effective interventions for achieving hospitals’ infection prevention objectives.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Russian Version of the Leading a Culture of Quality in Infection Prevention Scale among Nurses in Kazakhstan

Cruz,

Colet,

Almazan

et al. 2023

Journal of Nursing Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A correlation coefficient greater than 0.7 was generally considered good. [51][52][53] Test-retest reliability Test-retest reliability reflects the stability and consistency of the test across time. Using the same test method, some participants were tested twice, in turn, and the correlation coefficient of the scores obtained from the 2 tests was calculated.…”

Section: Internal Consistencymentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index among frontline COVID-19 health care workers using classical test theory and item response theory

Lin

Wang

et al. 2022

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study Objectives: The applicability of sleep-related scales to frontline medical staff for the COVID-19 pandemic has not been fully proved, so sleep survey results lack credibility and accuracy, creating difficulties for the guidance and treatment of frontline medical staff with sleep disorders, which is not conducive to the prevention and control of COVID-19. This study sought to analyze the reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) among frontline medical staff fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A network questionnaire survey was used to investigate the PSQI among frontline medical staff who fought COVID-19 in Wuhan, China from March 19 to April 15, 2020. Combined with classical test theory and item response theory, the content validity, internal consistency, construct validity, and other aspects of the PSQI were evaluated. Results: According to classical test theory, content validity, criterion validity, and construct validity of the PSQI were good. But the internal consistency was better after the deletion of the "daytime dysfunction" subscale. With regard to item response theory, difficulty, the differential item function, and the Wright map performed well. Conclusions: The original PSQI showed acceptable applicability in frontline COVID-19 medical staff, and its characteristics moderately improved after the "daytime dysfunction" subscale was removed.

show abstract

Development and psychometric evaluation of Nurses and Midwives’ Perceptions of their Roles in Primary Healthcare

Cited by 2 publications

References 11 publications

Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Russian Version of the Leading a Culture of Quality in Infection Prevention Scale among Nurses in Kazakhstan

Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Russian Version of the Leading a Culture of Quality in Infection Prevention Scale among Nurses in Kazakhstan

Reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index among frontline COVID-19 health care workers using classical test theory and item response theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About