2020
DOI: 10.4274/tjps.galenos.2019.27136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Statistical Optimization of Solid Lipid Nanoparticle Formulations of Fluticasone Propionate

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to develop Fluticasone propionate (FP)-loaded solid lipid nanoparticle (SLN) formulations using the factorial design approach. METHODS: Tristearin percentages (X1) (1%, 2% and 4%) and homogenization cycles (X2) (2, 4, 8 cycles) were selected as independent variables in the factorial design. SLN formulations were optimized by multiple regression analysis (MLR) to evaluate the influence of the selected process and formulation independent variables on SLNs characteristics n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the low quantity of FP and SAL in the final formula, it is possible that FP and SAL transformed into amorphous material within the nanoparticles. Similar findings were reported by Amasya et al [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Despite the low quantity of FP and SAL in the final formula, it is possible that FP and SAL transformed into amorphous material within the nanoparticles. Similar findings were reported by Amasya et al [ 37 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…DSC was used to determine the physical characteristics and crystal structure of coenzyme Q10, solid lipids, and coenzyme Q10 NLCs [19]. Meanwhile, the DSC thermogram of tristearin and stearyl alcohol as presented in Figure 1 showed two endothermic peaks, indicating the presence of a crystal structure in tristearin and stearyl alcohol [20,21]. In general, triglycerides and fatty acids exhibit three different polymorphs [22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle size distributions of almost all coenzyme Q10 NLCs were narrow and homogenous, except (F5). It is due to the PDI of Q10 NLCs were <0.3 (Amasya et al, 2020;Öztürk et al, 2020) as shown in Table 2. The zeta potentials of the Q10 NLCs were -21.5 to -56.2 mv, as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Particle Size Pdi and Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The melting points and enthalpies of the coenzyme NLCs were lower than the melting points and enthalpies of coenzyme Q10 and myristic acid. It was due to that coenzyme Q10 become an amorphous phase and molecularly dispersed into the lipid matrix (Aliasgharlou et al, 2016;Bhattacharyya and Reddy, 2019;Amasya et al, 2020).…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetry (Dsc)mentioning
confidence: 99%