2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11414-018-9623-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Testing of an Addiction Treatment Level of Care Determination Tool

Abstract: Two studies examined inter-rater reliability and content-related validity of an addiction treatment level of care determination tool currently in use in New York, the LOCADTR 3.0. The studies occurred after tool implementation. In study 1, 139 providers used the LOCADTR 3.0 to determine level of care for four case vignettes. Inter-rater reliability coefficients were calculated. In study 2, 387,338 state records from existing data were analyzed to determine how often providers opted to override the LOCADTR 3.0 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,7 Medicaid is requiring justification of medical necessity for beneficiaries receiving treatment in higher levels of care. 8 The American Society for Addiction Medicine (ASAM) criteria for patient placement have become the most commonly used level of care determination tools in the SUD field. First published in 1991, the ASAM Patient Placement Criteria were developed to serve as consensus standards for the SUD treatment field and promote common language and placement guidelines for assigning patients to treatment at different levels and intensities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,7 Medicaid is requiring justification of medical necessity for beneficiaries receiving treatment in higher levels of care. 8 The American Society for Addiction Medicine (ASAM) criteria for patient placement have become the most commonly used level of care determination tools in the SUD field. First published in 1991, the ASAM Patient Placement Criteria were developed to serve as consensus standards for the SUD treatment field and promote common language and placement guidelines for assigning patients to treatment at different levels and intensities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shifts in SUD funding are also making treatment matching increasingly necessary, as the federal government allows more flexibility for Medicaid coverage of treatment in residential SUD programs 6,7 . Medicaid is requiring justification of medical necessity for beneficiaries receiving treatment in higher levels of care 8 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%