Development and Testing of Improved Efficiency Boron-Enriched Diammonium Phosphate Fertilizers

Samreen, Tayyaba; Degryse, Fien; Baird, Roslyn; Silva, Rodrigo C. da; Zahir, Zahir Ahmad; Nazir, Muhammad Zulqernain; Wakeel, Abdul; Sidra-Tul-Muntaha,; McLaughlin, Michael J.

doi:10.1007/s42729-021-00428-w

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ca and B (Karthika et al, 2020) [59] . Accordingly, in soil nutrients which are present in anionic condition are mostly mobile like NO 3 -, SO 4 2-, BO 3 3-, Clalong with a exception of Mn 2+ (Samreen et al, 2021) [102] . In soil Less mobile plant nutrients are NH 4 + , K + , Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Cu 2+ (Klimczyk et al, 2021) [62] .…”

Section: Classification Of Plant Nutrientmentioning

confidence: 99%

Judicial nutrient management for sustainable production of groundnut: A Review

Gorai,

Darvhankar,

Mathpal

et al. 2024

Int. J. Res. Agron.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Groundnut is a leguminous and oilseed crop cultivated throughout the globe due to its excellent nutritional values. Area under groundnut cultivation increased over time though productivity became stagnant and not given the desirable value. Key cause associated with this problem is indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizer which continuously deteriorates soil health and quality. Cultivation through organic inputs is a smatter way to improve soil health but due to population explosion it does not seems a feasible option for developing countries like India. Comprehensive approach should be taken to meet the both end and find a middle way for sustainable production of ground nut over a prolonged period of time. Integrated nutrient management (INM) acts as a bridge between two between two extreme concepts i.e. chemical fertilization and organic farming. INM is getting popular now a days for higher sustainable yield in minimal fertilization. Impact of different fertilizers, organics and integrated approach has been discussed on yield, growth and oil content of ground in this present article through a collective manner.

show abstract

Section: Classification Of Plant Nutrientmentioning

confidence: 99%

Judicial nutrient management for sustainable production of groundnut: A Review

Gorai,

Darvhankar,

Mathpal

et al. 2024

Int. J. Res. Agron.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of another 155 field experiments conducted in China from 2008 to 2011 presented an average yield increase of 6.5% due to S fertilizer application [18]. However, the application of an S-only fertilizer is often not practiced in agricultural production due to the high handling costs involved and poor distribution in the field [19]. Adding S fertilizer into macronutrient fertilizers such as phosphate fertilizers could address these concerns and has gained widespread attention in the research field [20][21][22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effects of Ammonium Phosphate with Different Sulfur Additions on Crop Yield and Nutrient Uptake in Calcareous Soil

Lu,

Liu,

Zhu

et al. 2024

Agronomy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sulfur (S) deficiency is becoming increasingly prevalent, posing a serious threat to crop yield and quality. The incorporation of S fertilizers into macronutrient fertilizers such as ammonium phosphate represents a straightforward and economically efficient approach to alleviating S deficiency, strengthening S supply, and improving crop yield. However, limited research has been conducted to assess the effect of monoammonium phosphate (MAP) and diammonium phosphate (DAP) with different S additions on agronomic outcomes. In this study, ammonium sulfate and elemental S with S set at 3%, 6%, 9%, and 12% (ensuring a 1:1 ratio of SO4−S to elemental S) were granulated with MAP and DAP, respectively. Maize was used as the test crop to evaluate its yield, nutrient uptake, and apparent sulfur recovery. The results showed that S-fortified MAP treatment increased crop yield and S uptake by an average of 9.3% and 10.6%, respectively. A significant difference in crop yield and S uptake was observed when the S addition in MAP exceeded 9% S. Nevertheless, no statistical difference was found among the DAP-based treatments in calcareous soil. There was a strong relationship between S applied in fertilizers and S uptake by crops for MAP-based treatments. However, the apparent sulfur recovery drastically dropped from 44.2% to 7.19% with the increased addition level of S for MAP-based fertilizers. The results of this study indicate that the addition of S to MAP could be a simple, low-cost, and effective approach with great potential to promote S fertilizer application, minimize soil S deficiency, and improve crop yield in calcareous soil.

show abstract

“…colemanite (Ca2B6O11•5H2O) and ulexite (NaCaB5O9•8H2O), has been suggested (Broschat, 2008;Saleem et al, 2011) and various fertilizer formulations have been developed, e.g. colemanite/ulexite co-granulated with muriate of potash (da Silva et al, 2018), sintered colemanite pellets (Flores et al, 2006) and wax/sulfur-coated colemanite within a pellet of diammonium phosphate (Samreen et al, 2021). In addition to naturally-occurring B minerals, also synthetic slow-release B materials have been developed, e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%