2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of main potential ABE fermentation inhibitors identified in agro-food waste hydrolysates

Abstract: Lignocellulosic agro-food wastes are regarded as interesting carbohydrate sources for acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation. However, the physicochemical and enzymatic pretreatments applied to release their sugars generate inhibitory compounds that hinder the fermentation. The release of inhibitory compounds in the hydrolysates of four agro-food industrial wastes [apple pomace (AP), potato peel (PP), brewers' spent grain (BSG) and coffee silverskin (CS)] obtained after various chemical pretreatments (acid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing both alkaline pretreatments, it can be observed that the washing step removes formic acid, acetic acid, and total phenolic compounds to a great extent. As for the acidic treatment, it produced the highest amounts of acetic acid, levulinic acid, 5-HMF, and furfural, which is in agreement with the capacity of strong acids to hydrolyse carbohydrate polymers and degrade hexoses and pentoses into inhibitory substances (Palmqvist and Hahn-Hägerdal 2000;Paniagua-García et al 2019). In any case, it was possible to minimise inhibitor generation during acidic pretreatment, thanks to the RSM performed on vine shoots, especially in terms of formic acid (section "Establishment of optimal conditions for the acidic pretreatment").…”
Section: Pretreatment Typessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…When comparing both alkaline pretreatments, it can be observed that the washing step removes formic acid, acetic acid, and total phenolic compounds to a great extent. As for the acidic treatment, it produced the highest amounts of acetic acid, levulinic acid, 5-HMF, and furfural, which is in agreement with the capacity of strong acids to hydrolyse carbohydrate polymers and degrade hexoses and pentoses into inhibitory substances (Palmqvist and Hahn-Hägerdal 2000;Paniagua-García et al 2019). In any case, it was possible to minimise inhibitor generation during acidic pretreatment, thanks to the RSM performed on vine shoots, especially in terms of formic acid (section "Establishment of optimal conditions for the acidic pretreatment").…”
Section: Pretreatment Typessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The analytical characteristics obtained are significantly improved compared to those reported for the simultaneous determination of syringaldehyde and vanillin using voltammetry [ 26 ] and other methods [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 ] ( Table 5 ), as well as for the individual determination of the aldehydes [ 48 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ] ( Table S1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Simultaneous quantification of syringaldehyde and vanillin has been successfully achieved using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ] and ultra-HPLC [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ] with UV- [ 8 , 12 ], diode-array [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], and tandem mass-spectrometric [ 13 , 14 , 15 ] detection. Capillary electrophoresis with UV-detection [ 16 ] and high-performance capillary electrophoresis with diode-array detection [ 2 , 17 ] have been developed for the simultaneous determination of syringaldehyde and vanillin in cognac, brandy, and aged wine distillates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%