Background: Presurgical computed tomography (CT)-based identification is frequently employed for minimization of thoracotomy conversion rate, while enhancing video-based thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) sublobar resection rate for ground glass nodules (GGNs). Herein, we compared the clinical efficacies between presurgical CT-based hook-wire and indocyanine green (IG)-based identification of GGNs.
Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2021, we recruited 86 patients who undertook CT-based hook-wire or IG-based GGNs identification prior to VATS resection in our hospital, and compared the clinical efficiency and safety of both techniques.
Results: In all, we selected 38 patients with 39 GGNs who received hook-wire- and 48 patients with 50 GGNs who received IG-based GNN identification. We observed no marked differences in baseline information between the two patient cohorts. Based on our analysis, the technical success rates of CT-based hook-wire- and IG-based localization were 97.4% and 100%, respectively (P = 1.000). Moreover, the average localization duration (15.3 ± 6.3 min vs. 11.2 ± 5.3 min, P = 0.002) and VAS (4.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.0 ± 0.5, P = 0.001) were considerably elevated among the hook-wire patients, relative to the IG patients. Pneumothorax occurred in 9 (23.7%) and 3 (6.3%) hook-wire and IG patients, respectively (P = 0.048). Lung hemorrhage occurred in 11 (28.9%) and 6 (12.5%) hook-wire and IG patients, respectively (P = 0.057). Lastly, VTAS sublobar resection was successful among all patients receiving CT-directed identification.
Conclusions: Both hook-wire- and IG-based identification successfully identified GGNs prior to VATS resection. However, the presurgical CT-directed IG identification performed far better than the hook-wire-based identification. Moreover, it was associated with reduced complication rates, pain score, and shorter identification duration.