2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2015.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a three dimensional dynamic biomechanical lifting model for lower back evaluation for careful box placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial computation of reaction forces using the simplified model that didn't take into account muscular force offered the maximum force at the knee joint contrary to AnyBody results. Validation for the AnyBody results was done by obtaining a set of maximum joint force data for the lumbosacral joint L5 -S1, which were compared to literature (Stambolian, 2016) conducting similar experiments for lower back evaluation, using the same AnyBody software. The computed results were also compared to data from literature studies (Hwang, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial computation of reaction forces using the simplified model that didn't take into account muscular force offered the maximum force at the knee joint contrary to AnyBody results. Validation for the AnyBody results was done by obtaining a set of maximum joint force data for the lumbosacral joint L5 -S1, which were compared to literature (Stambolian, 2016) conducting similar experiments for lower back evaluation, using the same AnyBody software. The computed results were also compared to data from literature studies (Hwang, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reason for this behavior is not clear, and it is necessary to reveal the reason to improve the method of operation by lower limb movement. Thus, this study conducted musculoskeletal analysis for three-DOF position manipulation [22]- [23] and quantitatively evaluated the muscle load during operation by the lower limbs because the muscle load in the motion is assumed to be related to the abovementioned motion characteristics. Through the analysis, we clarified the specific leg motions that reduced the muscle load and investigated the reason for the observed motion characteristics by comparing them with the previous experimental results [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contudo, nem sempre é isso que acontece nas indústrias brasileiras -muitas vezes, o trabalhador se depara com a necessidade de adaptação ao seu ambiente de trabalho e/ou com a falta de descrição de como realizar sua tarefa adequadamente, o que pode acabar gerando riscos à sua segurança e à sua saúde. Moreira (2004) GRANDJEAN, 2005;AGNELLI et al;STAMBOLIAN et al, 2016;WATERS et al, 1993;LEE, 2016). do trabalhador e a fadiga física (IIDA, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified