12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (27th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-2585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a 3D Linearized Euler Solver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such methods have been developed for a number of fan noise sources and specific configurations. [2][3][4][5] The use of these methods requires more expertise than the empirical models and often require access to fairly detailed aerodynamic and geometric input parameters from independent measurements and computations. As such, these methods can require significantly more computer resources and run times compared to the empirical methods, but potentially offer a level of fidelity that allows more accurate assessment of current designs and development of noise reduction strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods have been developed for a number of fan noise sources and specific configurations. [2][3][4][5] The use of these methods requires more expertise than the empirical models and often require access to fairly detailed aerodynamic and geometric input parameters from independent measurements and computations. As such, these methods can require significantly more computer resources and run times compared to the empirical methods, but potentially offer a level of fidelity that allows more accurate assessment of current designs and development of noise reduction strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods have been developed for a number of fan noise sources 2,3 and specific configurations. [4][5][6][7] The use of these methods requires more expertise than the empirical models and often requires access to fairly detailed aerodynamic and geometric input parameters from independent measurements and computations. As such, these methods can require significantly more computer resources and run times compared to the empirical methods, but potentially offer a level of fidelity that allows more accurate assessment of current designs and development of noise reduction strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DRP scheme, has been on the scene longest. It forms the basis for many CAA research [67] and in-house industry codes [66]. Some of these are able to solve large 3D turbofan problems at realistic frequencies [68].…”
Section: Structured Methods For Leementioning
confidence: 99%