2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a case-finding algorithm for the identification of non-small cell lung cancers in a region-wide Italian pathology registry

Abstract: Purpose To develop and validate a case-finding algorithm for the identification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) cases in a region-wide Italian pathology registry (PR). Materials and methods Data collected between 2009 and 2017 in the PR and the Pharmacy Database of the University Hospital of Siena and the PR of Tuscany region were used. A NSCLC-identification algorithm based on free-text keywords and SNOMED morphology and topography codes was designed and tested on data from Siena: indication for drug … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 However, in pharmacoepidemiology, it is essential to validate the newly developed algorithms for the identification of outcomes, covariates, as well as indication of use. [9][10][11][12] In claims database the lack of information on the indication of use represents a well-known limitation for the conduct of observational studies. Understanding the specific reason why a medication was prescribed is crucial for accurately interpreting outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, in pharmacoepidemiology, it is essential to validate the newly developed algorithms for the identification of outcomes, covariates, as well as indication of use. [9][10][11][12] In claims database the lack of information on the indication of use represents a well-known limitation for the conduct of observational studies. Understanding the specific reason why a medication was prescribed is crucial for accurately interpreting outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%