2019
DOI: 10.17811/rifie.48.2.2019.229-238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate teacher training for inclusion: the CEFI-R

Abstract: In its conclusions on the social dimension of education and training, the Council of the European Union (2010) identified three essential challenges for all the educational systems of the 21st century: (1) social inclusion should, by means of education and training, ensure equal opportunities of access to quality education; (2) it should provide key competences to all students and especially to those who have to deal with educational disadvantages and special needs of support; (3) access to high quality educat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good reliability values are an indispensable characteristic for the use of these results [ 41 ]. In our study, values above 0.70 were obtained in all dimensions, in line with similar studies [ 4 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Good reliability values are an indispensable characteristic for the use of these results [ 41 ]. In our study, values above 0.70 were obtained in all dimensions, in line with similar studies [ 4 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Teacher preparation for inclusion: The Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Teacher Preparation for Inclusion (CEFI-R) [ 20 ] was used ( Appendix A ). The CEFI-R is made up of 19 items grouped into four dimensions: (1) “Conception of diversity” (5 items) which measure beliefs of the concept of diversity, place, and form of schooling of students and educational policy on diversity; (2) “Methodology” (5 items), for aspects related to the design and development of an inclusive curriculum; (3) “Supports” (4 items), about teacher’s conception and role in this concept; and (4) “Community Participation” (5 items), which measures collaboration of all educational actors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These basic questions are intended for further comparison between different educational actors and educational stages [ 50 ]. The Evaluation of Teacher Training for Inclusion Questionnaire, CEFI-R [ 51 ], was used. The CEFIR-R consists of 19 items, grouped into four dimensions: (1) Conception of diversity (five items), (2) Methodology (five items), (3) Supports (4 items) and Community participation (5 items).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Evaluation of Teachers' Inclusion Readiness (CEFI-R) Questionnaire was used, which consists of a total of 19 items grouped into four dimensions [32]: (1) Conception of Diversity (5 items), which measures beliefs regarding the concept of diversity, place and form of schooling of students and educational policy on diversity; (2) Methodology (5 items), for aspects related to the design and development of an inclusive curriculum;…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are some instruments that assess inclusive education [ 12 , 13 ], these tools are focused either on the characteristics of students with special needs or on educational practices [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. The Evaluation of Teachers’ Preparation for Inclusion (CEFI-R) [ 32 ] is a widely used questionnaire that can generate an overview of teachers’ perceptions about their preparation to address educative inclusion. However, its factor structure and reliability in the specific context of Spanish primary schoolteachers is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%