2010
DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e3181b4b04f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Quality of Life Instrument for Patients With Liver Cancer QOL-LC

Abstract: The instrument is of good validity, reliability, and responsiveness and has been broadly used in China.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of translating a validated instrument into a local language, instead of developing a new one, is primarily the relatively short amount of time and convenient for cross-cultural QOL comparisons, given the EORTC QLQ module is specifically developed for use in international trials with a large database being available to facilitate comparisons across studies. A second advantage of the QLQ-HCC18 is that it provides much more domains scores for different aspects of functioning, compared to other QOL instruments for HCC like FACT-Hep (10,11), QOL-LC (12,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The advantage of translating a validated instrument into a local language, instead of developing a new one, is primarily the relatively short amount of time and convenient for cross-cultural QOL comparisons, given the EORTC QLQ module is specifically developed for use in international trials with a large database being available to facilitate comparisons across studies. A second advantage of the QLQ-HCC18 is that it provides much more domains scores for different aspects of functioning, compared to other QOL instruments for HCC like FACT-Hep (10,11), QOL-LC (12,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, very few Chinese QOL instruments are available even more and more clinicians are concerned with the QOL of patients with HCC in China (7,(12)(13)(14)(15), and the Chinese is the largest population in the world. To our knowledge, there are no reports on the development of the simplified Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-HCC18.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two studies recruited patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancers as samples (Friend et al , ; Kaupp‐Roberts et al , ) and three studies recruited patients with hepatocellular cancer, with the number of samples ranging from 105 to 232 (Chie et al , ; Mikoshiba et al , ; Wan et al , ). Furthermore, three studies recruited patients with hepatobiliary or pancreatic cancers (Butt et al , ; Heffernan et al , ; Yount et al , ) and another two studies recruited patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (Blazeby et al , ) and patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (Cella et al , ) as samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these disease‐specific HRQoL questionnaires, the EORTC QLQ‐BIL21 was a specific evaluation instrument for patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancers (Friend et al , ; Kaupp‐Roberts et al , ) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire‐Liver Metastases of Colorectal Cancer (EORTC QLQ‐LMC21) performed as a HRQoL assessment tool that had been designed specifically for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (Blazeby et al , ). Both the EORTC QLQ‐HCC18 and the Quality of Life for Patients with Liver Cancer Instrument (QOL‐LC) were developed to evaluate disease‐specific HRQoL among patients with hepatocellular cancer (Chie et al , ; Wan et al , ). Moreover, the FACT‐Hep was adopted to test the HRQoL of patients with primary liver cancer, hepatobiliary–pancreatic cancers, or metastatic pancreatic cancer across studies (Cella et al , ; Heffernan et al , ) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Hepatobiliary Symptom Index‐8 (FHSI‐8) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Hepatobiliary Symptom Index‐18 (FHSI‐18) were designed to measure the HRQoL among patients with hepatobiliary–pancreatic cancers (Butt et al , ; Yount et al , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%