2022
DOI: 10.3390/f13020176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a 36K SNP Array for Radiata Pine (Pinus radiata D.Don)

Abstract: Radiata pine (Pinus radiata D.Don) is one of the world’s most domesticated pines and a key economic species in New Zealand. Thus, the development of genomic resources for radiata pine has been a high priority for both research and commercial breeding. Leveraging off a previously developed exome capture panel, we tested the performance of 438,744 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on a screening array (NZPRAD01) and then selected 36,285 SNPs for a final genotyping array (NZPRAD02). These SNPs aligned to 15,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our analyses, as few as 2000-5000 markers were sufficient to reach a plateau in predictive ability, which is not surprising given the high level of relatedness within and across the populations we used and is consistent with both theoretical [75] and empirical results [71]. It is also possible that linkage disequilibrium caused by the recent admixture of breeding populations developed in New Zealand, including the surprisingly high proportion of trees with island ancestry [32], made it possible to achieve moderate GBLP predictive abilities with a relatively small number of markers. Genomic prediction in more homogeneous populations of distantly related individuals indicate that the number of markers needed to saturate predictive ability is both trait-and population-specific [47,83,84].…”
Section: Genomic Prediction (Gblup)supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our analyses, as few as 2000-5000 markers were sufficient to reach a plateau in predictive ability, which is not surprising given the high level of relatedness within and across the populations we used and is consistent with both theoretical [75] and empirical results [71]. It is also possible that linkage disequilibrium caused by the recent admixture of breeding populations developed in New Zealand, including the surprisingly high proportion of trees with island ancestry [32], made it possible to achieve moderate GBLP predictive abilities with a relatively small number of markers. Genomic prediction in more homogeneous populations of distantly related individuals indicate that the number of markers needed to saturate predictive ability is both trait-and population-specific [47,83,84].…”
Section: Genomic Prediction (Gblup)supporting
confidence: 82%
“…This platform allowed us to generate data for 50,917 SNP markers. Second, a subset of the GBS markers were used to develop a custom radiata pine Affymetrix Axiom 36K array, NZPRAD02, which included 36,285 SNPs [32].…”
Section: Genomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these systems, metagenomic methods are unlikely to be effective. For example, the Pinus radiata genome is approximately 25 billion base pairs in size [ 70 ] (or ~ 8 x the human genome); the detection let alone assembly of microbial genomes that are 1000’s of times smaller and far less abundant in DNA concentration than that of the host, will be challenging (and expensive). Regardless, the benefit of conducting culture-based isolation and genome sequencing is the capacity to gain direct information from the culture itself, from fundamental physiological information (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forest tree species, SNP arrays have been developed in the last decade for economically important genera like Populus , Eucalyptus , and several conifers (Ahmar et al., 2021; Grattapaglia, 2022). However, most recently developed SNP arrays in conifer species were exclusively based on transcriptomic data (RNA‐seq, exome capture sequencing, and candidate genes), thus representing only coding, genic regions (Chancerel et al., 2013; Graham et al., 2022; Howe et al., 2020; Kastally et al., 2022; Pavy et al., 2013; Perry et al., 2020; Plomion et al., 2016). A few studies have used genome‐wide reduced‐representation sequencing as a complement to transcriptomic sources for conifer SNP array development (Caballero et al., 2021; Jackson et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breeding of Scots pine in Sweden started with the selection of plus trees in the 1940s and 1950s, and a further expansion of the breeding populations occurred in the 1980s (Haapanen et al., 2015). Until recently, conifer SNP arrays have been limited to a couple thousand SNPs, and are currently based on RNA sequencing, exome capture, or candidate gene sequencing (Chancerel et al., 2013; Graham et al., 2022; Howe et al., 2020; Kastally et al., 2022; Pavy et al., 2013; Perry et al., 2020; Plomion et al., 2016; reviewed in Ahmar et al., 2021; Grattapaglia, 2022). Markers in such SNP arrays thus only represent coding sequences, leaving out all the intergenic space, which constitutes the bigger part of the genome and is an integral part of population genetics studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%