2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a case definition for epilepsy for use with administrative health data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
151
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
151
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seizures were identified through emergency room and hospitalization records using validated ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. 21,22 We then excluded records with invalid or inaccurate information and all patients younger than 18 years at the time of the seizure. We further excluded patients with a diagnosis of a brain tumor in the previous 5 years as occasionally patients with brain tumors undergo surgery because of focal neurologic deficits, the tumor's nature (e.g., malignancy), and not because their seizures are refractory to medical treatment.…”
Section: Methods Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seizures were identified through emergency room and hospitalization records using validated ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. 21,22 We then excluded records with invalid or inaccurate information and all patients younger than 18 years at the time of the seizure. We further excluded patients with a diagnosis of a brain tumor in the previous 5 years as occasionally patients with brain tumors undergo surgery because of focal neurologic deficits, the tumor's nature (e.g., malignancy), and not because their seizures are refractory to medical treatment.…”
Section: Methods Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous epidemiologic studies [11][12][13][14] have found that these data sources have a high level of completeness and validity. Physicians must submit diagnostic codes (up to 3 per visit) to be reimbursed under the feefor-service insurance plan, and relatively few Alberta physicians (< 7%) are on alternate payment plans, compared with other Canadian provinces.…”
Section: Study Setting and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although individuals responsible for ICD coding in the DAD receive standardized training in Canada (33), there may still be coding variations across provinces that could limit the generalizability of these findings. Previous studies have compared the validity of case identification using administrative data against chart review in the areas of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and found that the sensitivity results (diabetes mellitus range 90.2-92.1%, hypertension range 74.0-76.0%) are not significantly different between 2 provinces (Alberta and British Columbia) (21,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%