Development and validation of a rapid psychosocial well-being screening tool in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Thanasansomboon, Bhumipat; Choemprayong, Songphan; Parinyanitikul, Napa; Tanlamai, Uthai; Wisessathorn, Manika; Patarapongsant, Yupin

doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.06.002

International Journal of Nursing Sciences

2022

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.06.002

|View full text |Cite

Development and validation of a rapid psychosocial well-being screening tool in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Bhumipat Thanasansomboon

Songphan Choemprayong

Napa Parinyanitikul

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being

Zhang,

Balloo,

Hosein

et al. 2024

BMC Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to identify the conceptualisation of overall well-being used for well-being assessment through a review of the characteristics and key components and/or dimensions of well-being scales as presented in current literature. Scopus and Web of Science were searched, and thematic analysis was conducted inductively to analyse the identified components within scales, as well as the types of well-being these scales measure. 107 peer-reviewed articles from 2003 to 2022 were included, and 69 well-being scales were identified covering nine areas of well-being. Four final themes were identified as the foundational dimensions of overall well-being: hedonic; eudaimonic; physical health; and generic happiness. Notably, these 69 scales are mainly validated and adopted in the Western context. ‘4 + N’ frameworks of overall well-being are recommended for assessing overall well-being. This review provides researchers with a synthesis of what types of well-being have been measured and which measures have been used to assess these types of well-being for which research participants. Non-Western-based well-being research is called for that incorporates a broader range of research participants and cultural contexts in contributing to a more inclusive understanding of well-being. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40359-024-02074-0.

show abstract

A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being

Zhang,

Balloo,

Hosein

et al. 2024

BMC Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Development and validation of a rapid psychosocial well-being screening tool in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Cited by 1 publication

References 67 publications

A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being

A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About