2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a rapid LC–MS/MS method for determination of methylated nucleosides and nucleobases in urine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The method was validated for selectivity, calibration curve, precision, accuracy, stability, matrix effect, dilution integrity and carryover according to the guidelines of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The results were published previously [47]. The linearity of the calibration curve was evaluated via the R 2 regression coefficient >0.995.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method was validated for selectivity, calibration curve, precision, accuracy, stability, matrix effect, dilution integrity and carryover according to the guidelines of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The results were published previously [47]. The linearity of the calibration curve was evaluated via the R 2 regression coefficient >0.995.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the relative matrix effect for all analytes in urine did not exceed 15%, as required by validation criteria. It was found that the quantification of nucleosides performed by LC-MS/MS using tubercidin as an internal standard was of acceptable accuracy and precision [47].…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the desired separation, such chromatographic factors need to be properly adjusted. HILIC methods are often developed using a typical univariate approach, which can be very time-consuming and often leads to a non-optimized method without adequate comprehension of main and interaction effects of method parameters. In contrast, a multivariate approach via DoE tools emphasizes systematic method development through assessment of multiparameter interaction effects using the minimum number of experiments, while also enabling a better comprehension of the method performance.…”
Section: Prediction Of Retention In Hilicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with tissue DNA and RNA samples, urine sample analysis also obviates the needs of tedious processes of extraction or digestion of nucleic acids. Along this line, various modified nucleosides, e.g., alkylated and oxidized nucleosides, were detected in human urine. As a novel epigenetic mark in eukaryotes, m 6 dA is present in human genome and its levels vary in different tissues, ,, and m 6 dA was also recently shown to be present in human urine . In addition, while previous studies revealed the presence of A m , m 6 A m , and m 6 2 A in human urine, , the levels of these modified nucleosides in urine samples have yet been accurately quantified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%