2015
DOI: 10.1111/eea.12315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a three‐step detection protocol for broad mites (Polyphagotarsonemus latus) in pot azalea (Rhododendron simsii hybrids)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our direct comparison of extraction methods showed that storing in ethanol and triplewashing leaves or crowns resulted in recovery of 5 and 14 times more cyclamen mites, on average, than using Berlese funnels did. Similarly, broad mite recovery was about six times greater from samples shaken in ethanol than from those placed in Berlese-Tullgren funnels (Mechant et al 2015). Extracting mites with Berlese funnels required less processing time than triple-washing samples did, and funnels have been used successfully for evaluating controlled atmospheric temperature-treatment effects on cyclamen mite (van Kruistum et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our direct comparison of extraction methods showed that storing in ethanol and triplewashing leaves or crowns resulted in recovery of 5 and 14 times more cyclamen mites, on average, than using Berlese funnels did. Similarly, broad mite recovery was about six times greater from samples shaken in ethanol than from those placed in Berlese-Tullgren funnels (Mechant et al 2015). Extracting mites with Berlese funnels required less processing time than triple-washing samples did, and funnels have been used successfully for evaluating controlled atmospheric temperature-treatment effects on cyclamen mite (van Kruistum et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berlese funnels have also been used to extract cyclamen mites from leaf and crown samples into ethanol, eliminating the need to mechanically separate mites from plant material (Fried and Schell 2000;van Kruistum et al 2015). Other small mites have been sampled from plant material using various techniques, including Tullgren funnels and water and sucrose (LeFors et al 2018), shaking in ethanol or water (Mechant et al 2015), or washing and sieving with detergent or ethanol (de Lillo 2001;Rezende et al 2012). Broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus (Banks) (Acari: Tarsonemidae), recovery from experimentally infested rhododendron, Rhododendron simsii Planchon (Ericaceae), was greater using a method where shoot tips were shaken in ethanol or water compared to those placed in Berlese-Tullgren funnels (Mechant et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The leaflets were soaked in alcohol and then filtered with a vacuum filtration set-up. 29 Mites were counted on the filter with a stereomicroscope (Leica M125 C; Wetzlar, Germany). The count of the higher and lower parts of the plants showed that mites were found almost exclusively on the lower part, therefore the analyses proceeded with the sum of both parts as one sample from the whole plant.…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five independent biological replicates were taken at each time point (n = 5), with one shoot tip per replicate for LC-MS/MS analysis and another for mite counts. The samples for LC-MS/MS analysis were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored until analysis at −80 • C. The broad mites were extracted from the sampled shoots following the three-step detection method including (1) sampling of shoot tips, (2) isolation of the mites in 70% ethanol and (3) sieving and vacuum filtration to facilitate counting [26]. Subsequently, the mites were counted using a binocular microscope (Olympus SZX16, Antwerp, Belgium; max 115×).…”
Section: Plant Materials and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%