Development and validation of a Portuguese version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10-Portuguese)

Mathias, L; Carlos, Ricardo Vieira; Siaulys, M.; Gabriades, P.; Guo, Nan; Domingue, Ben; O'Carroll, James; Carvalho, Brendan; Sultan, Pervez

doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101085

Cited by 9 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our data indicated that the ObsQoR-10-Thai did not correlate with maternal age, ASA physical status, operative time, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, or length of hospital stay. This is consistent with previous studies [ 8 , 10 , 13 ]. This could be a limitation of the clinical validity of the ObsQoR-10-Thai in this setting.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 94%

“…In our cohort, the median 24-h ObsQoR-10-Thai was 57, which was lower than that reported in the US (median: 77) [ 8 ] and Brazilian populations (median: 84) [ 13 ]. In both the Thai and Indian cohorts of women undergoing elective cesarean delivery, dizziness and nausea/vomiting were among the three highest ranked ObsQoR recovery items.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 82%

“…The lowest three ranked items in the Thai cohort were the ability to hold the baby, look after their personal hygiene, and mobilize and in the US cohort were pain, shivering, and dizziness [ 8 ]. The lowest ranked item in both the US and Brazilian studies was pain, with mean scores of 5.8 [ 8 ] and 6.6 [ 13 ], respectively. Consistently, our mean pain score outcome was 6.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The ObsQoR-11 was first developed and evaluated for elective cesarean delivery at a single UK university hospital, with a moderate correlation between ObsQoR-11 and global health status (r = 0.53, P < 0.001) [5]. The ObsQoR-10 was demonstrated to have moderate correlation with global VAS (r = 0.57, 0.51, and 0.45 in Brazilian [13], US (8), and Indian (11) populations, respectively) and EuroQoL (r = -0.59 and -0.51 in Brazilian (13) and US (8) populations, respectively). The ObsQoR-10-Thai also had a moderate correlation with the global VAS score (0.45-0.6), suggesting that the ObsQoR-10-Thai is useful for measuring the quality of recovery after elective Post-partum hemorrhage (estimated blood loss ≥ 1,000 ml)…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The total score can range from 0 to 100, with 0 = worst recovery and 100 = best recovery. The ObsQoR-10 has been tested for validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical utility in measuring health status following cesarean delivery and spontaneous or vaginal delivery in multiple healthcare setting [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. A recent extensive scoping review using 'consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments' (COSMIN) criteria to evaluate the quality of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) instruments that have been utilized to assess postpartum recovery following caesarean section.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Validation of the Thai version of the obstetric quality of recovery score (obsqor-10-Thai) after elective cesarean delivery

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Obstetric Quality of Recovery score (ObsQoR-10) is a questionnaire used to assess recovery after cesarean delivery. However, the original ObsQoR-10 is in English and was mainly validated in the Western population. We therefore evaluated the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the ObsQoR-10-Thai in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Methods The original ObsQoR-10 was translated into Thai, and psychometric validation was performed to evaluate the quality of post-cesarean recovery. The ObsQoR-10-Thai, activities of daily living checklist, and 100-mm visual analog scale of global health (VAS-GH) questionnaires were administered to the study participants before and 24 and 48-h postpartum. Validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of the ObsQoR-10-Thai were assessed. Results We included 110 patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. The mean ObsQoR-10-Thai score at baseline and 24 and 48-h postpartum was 83.35 ± 11.15, 56.75 ± 11.6, and 70.96 ± 13.65, respectively. The ObsQoR-10-Thai score differed significantly between the two groups divided based on the VAS-GH (≥ 70 vs. < 70): 75.58 ± 13.81 and 52.56 ± 10.61, respectively (P < 0.001). The convergent validity between the ObsQoR-10-Thai and VAS-GH was good (r = 0.60, P < 0.001). The ObsQoR-10-Thai displayed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87), split-half reliability (0.92), and test–retest reliability (0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99). The median time to complete the questionnaire was 2 (IQR, 1–6) min. Conclusions Our findings indicate that the ObsQoR-10-Thai is valid and has good reliability, with a high degree of responsiveness in terms of assessment of recovery after elective cesarean delivery. Trial registration This study was registered on the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, identifier TCTR20210204001, registered on 04/02/2021 (Prospectively registration).

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 94%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 82%