Development and validation of a self‐efficacy scale for postoperative rehabilitation management of lung cancer patients

Huang, Feifei; Yang, Qing; Han, Xuan; Zhang, Jingping; Lin, Tian

doi:10.1002/pon.4296

Cited by 20 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The self-efficacy of postoperative rehabilitation management was measured using the Self-Efficacy Scale for Postoperative Rehabilitation Management of Lung Cancer (SESPRM-LC) [ 4 ]. The 27-item SESPRM-LC with six sub-domains was rated on a five-point Likert scale (1 = not at all confident to 5 = completely confident ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The total scores of SESPRM-LC ranged from 27 to 135, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. The reliability and validity have demonstrated sound psychometrics in NSCLC postsurgical patients through the classical test theory and item response theory methods [ 4 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In China, the incidence of lung cancer has markedly increased over the last few decades and is predicted to be 1 million per year by 2025 [ 2 , 3 ]. Presently, surgery remains the primary treatment for lung cancer [ 4 ]. Pulmonary rehabilitation management was found to effectively reduce the symptom burden and side effects after pneumonectomy, such as pain [ 5 ], fatigue [ 6 ], anxiety and depression [ 7 ], and increase lung function [ 8 , 9 ] and the quality of life (QOL) [ 10 , 11 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous studies have investigated the relationship between self-efficacy and numerous cancer-related factors, including socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, physical function, psychological distress (e.g., anxiety and depression), psychological growth (i.e. post-traumatic growth, PTG), health behaviors and QOL [ 4 , 14 – 16 ]. However, the pathway or mechanism associating self-efficacy with physical or psychological health outcomes on cancer patients is not well understood.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The structural equation model on self-efficacy during post-op rehabilitation among non-small cell lung cancer patients

Huang¹,

Yang²,

Zhang³

et al. 2018

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundsSelf-efficacy plays an important role in pulmonary rehabilitation, but it is still unknown which factors exert their effects on postsurgical rehabilitation self-efficacy among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study aims to assess relationships among physical function, social factors, psychological factors, quality of life (QOL) and self-efficacy, and the effects of these variables on self-efficacy among NSCLC patients.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was administered to 238 postsurgical NSCLC patients (response rate 95.2%) at five tertiary hospitals in Fuzhou, China. the participants completed a pack of questionnaires. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to test the hypothetical model.ResultsThe SEM results supported the hypothesized structural model (χ2/df = 1.511, p>0.05). The final model showed that confrontation coping, subjective well-being (SWB), social support, psychological growth (PTG) and anxiety and depression can be directly related to self-efficacy (coefficient = 0.335, coefficient = 0.288, coefficient = 0.150, coefficient = 0.024, and coefficient = -0.004, respectively, p<0.01). Confrontation coping also had indirect effect via SWB (coefficient = 0.085, p<0.01), which had indirect connection via PTG (coefficient = 0.005, p<0.01). Social support and anxiety and depression had indirect pathways as well. As expected, self-efficacy directly affected the quality of life.ConclusionsThis study suggests that higher confrontation coping style, SWB, social support, and PTG and lower anxiety and depression levels could effectively enhance their self-efficacy and consequently, improve QOL. These findings may help develop an intervention aimed at enhancing self-efficacy for this patient population.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The structural equation model on self-efficacy during post-op rehabilitation among non-small cell lung cancer patients

Huang¹,

Yang²,

Zhang³

et al. 2018

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, further item-level analysis may offer a promising solution. The psychometric analysis of the SLEI by Chen focused on the classical theory test (CTT), which is based on a raw score across all items (Huang et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Simple Version of the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Inventory: Classical Theory Test and Item Response Theory

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: High-fidelity simulation (HFS) has become a widely used and established pedagogy for teaching clinical nursing skills. Nevertheless, there are few evidence-based instruments that validate the effectiveness of simulation learning in mainland China. Methods:The Simulation Learning Effectiveness Inventory (SLEI) was adapted and validated for use in this study. Psychometric evaluation, incorporating classical test theory and item response theory (IRT) methods, was performed with 533 third-year undergraduate nursing students who were recruited from Results: The findings of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the simplified Chinese version of the SLEI (SLEI-SC) was composed of six factors, namely, course arrangement, equipment resource, debriefing, clinical ability, problem solving, and confidence, which explained 60.84% of the total variance. The Cronbach's α, MIIC, marginal reliability, and test-retest reliability values obtained for the total scale were 0.88, 0.38, 0.96, and 0.88, respectively. Furthermore, the difference between the total scores for learning effectiveness pre-and post-course was statistically significant (t = 2.59, p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.60). IRT analysis showed that the SLEI-SC discriminates well between students with high and low levels of learning effectiveness and offers information about a broad range of learning effectiveness measures. The relationship between final course grade and total score on the SLEI-SC was statistically significant (r = 0.63, p < 0.05). Conclusion:We demonstrated initial psychometric evidence and support for the 31item SLEI-SC as a developmentally appropriate instrument for assessing the learning effectiveness of all phases of HFS use with nursing students.

show abstract

Adaptation and Validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) in People Living with HIV in Myanmar

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Valid and reliable instruments for the measurement of mindfulness are crucial for people living with HIV. However, there was no Myanmar version of such an instrument. Methods We adapted the English version of the 12-item Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) based on standard cross-cultural procedures. By randomly sampling methods, a sample of 248 eligible people living with HIV was contacted from a closed Myanmar Facebook group; 159 PLHIV completed the initial 12-item version of the adapted survey. Results Three items were removed due to low item-to-total correlations of the corrected item-total correlation as well as having infit and outfit mean squares outside the range of 0.6 to 1.4. After deleting the 3 items, the three-factor structure was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis, which indicated good model fit. The resultant 9-item CAMS-R in Myanmar (CAMS-R-M-2) achieved good internal reliability (Cronbach’s α of 0.75 to 0.87, and the corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.44 to 0.81). Construct validity of the scale was demonstrated by significant association with self-reported HIV stigma and social support levels (r = 0.63, and − 0.53). In Rasch analysis, the infit and outfit mean squares for each item ranged from 0.49 to 1.24, and the person reliability was 2.17 and the separation index was 0.83. Conclusions The 9-item CAMS-R-M-2 with a three-factor structure has good reliability and validity. Higher total scores and subscale score reflected greater mindfulness qualities in people living with HIV in Myanmar.

show abstract

Development and validation of a self‐efficacy scale for postoperative rehabilitation management of lung cancer patients

Abstract: We demonstrated initial support for the reliability and validity of the 27-item SESPRM-LC, as a developmentally appropriate instrument for assessing self-efficacy among lung cancer patients during postoperative rehabilitation.

Cited by 20 publications

References 33 publications

The structural equation model on self-efficacy during post-op rehabilitation among non-small cell lung cancer patients

The structural equation model on self-efficacy during post-op rehabilitation among non-small cell lung cancer patients

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Simple Version of the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Inventory: Classical Theory Test and Item Response Theory

Adaptation and Validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) in People Living with HIV in Myanmar

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About