2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12500-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a multi-lingual online questionnaire for surveying the COVID-19 prevention and control measures used in global workplaces

Abstract: Background Despite widespread COVID-19 vaccination programs, there is an ongoing need for targeted disease prevention and control efforts in high-risk occupational settings. This study aimed to develop, pilot, and validate an instrument for surveying occupational COVID-19 infection prevention and control (IPC) measures available to workers in diverse geographic and occupational settings. Methods A 44-item online survey was developed in English and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the majority of previous studies have used one language, for example, French [ 135 , 136 ], Spanish [ 137 ], or Arabic [ 138 ]. Some studies used two languages, such as English and Hindi [ 139 , 140 ], for example, while four languages were used in the present study. The number of respondents (N = 1125) is quite high and heterogeneous compared to almost all questionnaires presented in previous studies; most studies had around between 300 and 500 responses [ 141 , 142 , 143 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the majority of previous studies have used one language, for example, French [ 135 , 136 ], Spanish [ 137 ], or Arabic [ 138 ]. Some studies used two languages, such as English and Hindi [ 139 , 140 ], for example, while four languages were used in the present study. The number of respondents (N = 1125) is quite high and heterogeneous compared to almost all questionnaires presented in previous studies; most studies had around between 300 and 500 responses [ 141 , 142 , 143 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing work-exposure to SARS-CoV-2 has become important for research [10,11]. Different study approaches for this purpose have been developed in other countries based on questionnaire surveys [12]. These surveys are considered more precise in distinguishing task-level differences in exposure among similar job categories, compared to a JEM [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,11] Different study approaches have been developed in other countries based on questionnaire surveys. [12] These surveys are considered more precise in distinguishing task-level differences in exposure among similar job categories, compared to a JEM. [13] However, most large studies don't have specific questions on work, and the JEM would be more accurate when considering asymptomatic cases and estimation of COVID-19, with a lower misclassification bias similar to a chemical JEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%