2019
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n6p2475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a diagrammatic scale for quantifying maize leaf spots caused by Diplodia macrospora

Abstract: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a diagrammatic scale to evaluate the severity of spots on maize leaves caused by the fungus Diplodia macrospora. Severity ranged between the minimal (0.5%) and maximal (55%) limits of disease severity, and intermediate severity levels were defined according to the "Weber-Fechner stimulus response law". The proposed scale describes six levels of severity based on how much of the leaf is affected: 0.5%, 3%, 8%, 23%, 36%, and 55%. Validation was carried out … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…- 30%. With the scale five evaluators were outside the range of -10 to 10, two of them (15.38% of the total evaluators) with errors between 15 and 20%, similar results were found in previous studies (SANTOS et al, 2017;TROJAN et al, 2018;LORENZETTI et al, 2019). Therefore, eight evaluators can be considered good in the assessment of the disease when using the scale (LIMA et al, 2013;NUÑEZ et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…- 30%. With the scale five evaluators were outside the range of -10 to 10, two of them (15.38% of the total evaluators) with errors between 15 and 20%, similar results were found in previous studies (SANTOS et al, 2017;TROJAN et al, 2018;LORENZETTI et al, 2019). Therefore, eight evaluators can be considered good in the assessment of the disease when using the scale (LIMA et al, 2013;NUÑEZ et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Regarding the t-test for the values of the intercept (a), the null hypothesis was rejected in more cases when the scale was not used, with the scale accepted values increased in a 20%. R 2 values improved when the scale was used, the R 2 average showed an increase of 3.16% compared with the value obtained without the scale, in both cases the evaluation of severity showed good precision, the values of R 2 were ≥0.85, considered high for this type of estimate (LIMA et al, 2013;TROJAN et al, 2018;LORENZETTI et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…SADs have been widely used as a tool to improve visual severity estimation of several foliar diseases in different crops (Del Ponte et al., 2017). For foliar corn diseases, the SADs have also improved visual estimates for eyespot (Camochena et al., 2008), white spot (Capucho et al., 2010; Malagi et al., 2011; Sachs et al., 2011), northern leaf blight (Lazaroto et al., 2012), diplodia leaf streak (Lorenzetti et al., 2019) and bacterial leaf streak (Braga et al., 2020) in field for adult plants. However, to our knowledge, no SADs had been developed to evaluate the severity of GLS in corn leaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and is more common for maize grown under warm and humid conditions of tropical and subtropical regions (Wordell Filho, Casa, & Nesi, 2016;Mário, Gozuen, & Juliatti, 2017). The ideal conditions for conidia germination are relative humidity over 50% and temperatures between 25 and 32°C (Lorenzetti et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%