2021
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmab148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring knowledge, attitudes, and current practices of primary healthcare physicians regarding road injury prevention in older adults

Abstract: Background Older adults present high risk of involvement in road crashes. Preventive interventions conducted by their primary healthcare physicians (PHPC) could reduce this public health issue. Objective The objective of this study was to design and validate a self-administered questionnaire that measures the knowledge, attitudes, and current practices (CP) of PHCP in Spain regarding the prevention of road injuries in older a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective of said questionnaire was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and strategies for the prevention of traffic accidents in elderly drivers carried out by FD. The knowledge and strategies evaluated specifically include those referring to the consumption of drugs that may increase the risk of suffering a TA [ 28 ]. Briefly, the target population consisted of all FD working in Spain at primary healthcare centres or emergency services.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The objective of said questionnaire was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and strategies for the prevention of traffic accidents in elderly drivers carried out by FD. The knowledge and strategies evaluated specifically include those referring to the consumption of drugs that may increase the risk of suffering a TA [ 28 ]. Briefly, the target population consisted of all FD working in Spain at primary healthcare centres or emergency services.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally, these 11 groups pertained to two categories defined a priori on the basis of our literature review: drugs associated with a high risk of interfering with fitness to drive (antiepileptics, antihistamines, benzodiazepines and muscle relaxants, codeine-based cough suppressants, and opioid analgesics), and those not associated with a high risk of interfering with driving ability (antiplatelet agents, antianginal agents, beta blockers, insulin and/or oral antidiabetics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEIs] and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]) [ 12 , 21 , 29 34 ]. During the process of questionnaire validation [ 28 ], factor analysis of the items in this part of the questionnaire disclosed that when the “insulin and/or oral antidiabetics” group was excluded, the remaining drugs or groups of medications were distributed in two factors that corresponded to the two groups defined a priori. For each group an average index was obtained by dividing the sum of the scores for all items in each group by 5: low-risk drug index (LRDI) and high-risk drug index (HRDI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study design is detailed in a previous work. 33 The objective of this study was to design and validate a self-administered questionnaire that measures the knowledge, attitudes and current practices (CP) of FPs in Spain regarding the prevention of road injuries in older adults. As a result, our questionnaire showed acceptable validity to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and prevention strategies regarding traffic injuries in older drivers by Spanish FPs.…”
Section: Study Design and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design (Supplementary File 1) and validation process of the questionnaire are also available elsewhere. 33 It included questions aimed at measuring three constructs: Attitudes about PCIOA, Knowledge about road traffic injuries in the elderly (ie, people over 65 years old), and Current Practices regarding PCIOA. For the present study, we used the following information:…”
Section: Source Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation