Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Prehospital Triage of Trauma Patients

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Prehospital trauma triage protocols are used worldwide to get the right patient to the right hospital and thereby improve the chance of survival and avert lifelong disabilities. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma set target levels for undertriage rates of less than 5%. None of the existing triage protocols has been able to achieve this target in isolation.OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a new prehospital trauma triage protocol to improve current triage rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSIn this multicenter cohort study, all patients with trauma who were 16 years and older and transported to a trauma center in 2 different regions of the Netherlands were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES A new prediction model was developed in the CentralNetherlands region based on prehospital predictors associated with severe injury. Severe injury was defined as an Injury Severity Score greater than 15. A full-model strategy with penalized maximum likelihood estimation was used to construct a model with 8 predictors that were chosen based on clinical reasoning. Accuracy of the developed prediction model was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. The model was externally validated in the Brabant region. RESULTSUsing data from 4950 patients with trauma from the Central Netherlands region for the design data set (58.3% male; mean [SD] age, 47 [21] years) and 6859 patients for the validation Brabant region (52.2% male; mean [SD] age, 51 [22] years), the following 8 significant predictors were selected for the prediction model: age; systolic blood pressure; Glasgow Coma Scale score; mechanism criteria; penetrating injury to the head, thorax, or abdomen; signs and/or symptoms of head or neck injury; expected injury in the Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax region; and expected injury in 2 or more Abbreviated Injury Scale regions. The prediction model showed a C statistic of 0.823 (95% CI, 0.813-0.832) and good calibration. The cutoff point with a minimum specificity of 50.0% (95% CI, 49.3%-50.7%) led to a sensitivity of 88.8% (95% CI, 87.5%-90.0%). External validation showed a C statistic of 0.831 (95% CI, 0.814-0.848) and adequate calibration. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThe new prehospital trauma triage prediction model may lower undertriage rates to approximately 10% with an overtriage rate of 50%. The next step should be to implement this prediction model with the use of a mobile app for emergency medical services professionals.Question Can a new prehospital prediction model for trauma triage lower the undertriage rate to approximately 10%, with a maximum overtriage rate of 50%?Findings In this multicenter cohort study that included 4950 patients with trauma, 8 highly significant predictors associated with injury severity were selected for the prediction model. The new prehospital trauma triage prediction model was externally validated and may lower the undertriage rate to 11.2% with an overtriage rate of 50.0%. Meaning This prediction model can be integrated in a mobile...

Changing from a two-tiered to a one-tiered trauma team activation protocol: a before–after observational cohort study investigating the clinical impact of undertriage

“…However, several studies from Norway have described considerable higher undertriage than the accepted 5% [5,9,10,16] and also considerable higher overtriage than accepted, of about 80% [10] using a one tier TTA model. A fresh Dutch study estimated considerable improvements in triage precision after identifying the most optimal triage criterias in their own trauma population [15]. Efforts have been made elsewhere to address patients > 65 years of age with low--energy falls, with expedited teams specifically addressed for this group.…”

An Economic Evaluation of Triage Tools For Patients With Suspected Severe Injuries In England

“…To generate these characteristics we obtained access to baseline demographic and clinical data from a recent prehospital major trauma triage study by van Rein et al, using the data collected in the Central Netherlands region. [12] This provided a high quality data set, which should be representative of developed world patient. This data is summarised in Table 1.…”

A Predictive Instrument for Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction

“…Such a comment would not be made in today's smartphone era: use of a prediction calculator to assist in physician knowledge and the practice of medicine is increasingly common. 3 Miettinen 4(p441) -the professor of the aforementioned epidemiology class-wrote in his eminent series on the modern scientific physician that the practice of medicine is an art: "Like Plato originally, and just before him, Aristotle distinguished science from the arts-the latter meaning 'productive' arts (techne), medicine among these. The essential difference between science and the arts was in the nature of the product: knowledge (episteme) vs artifacts or actions."…”