ObjectiveTo reach a Delphi‐generated international expert consensus on the diagnosis, prognostic, management, and core outcome set (COS) of fetal Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (LUTO).MethodsA three‐round Delphi procedure was conducted among an international panel of LUTO experts. The panel was provided with a list of literature review‐generated parameters for the diagnosis, prognostic, management, and outcomes. A parallel procedure was conducted along with patient groups during the development of COS.ResultsA total of 160 experts were approached, of whom 99 completed the first round and 80 (80/99, 80.8%) completed all three rounds. In the first trimester, an objective measurement of longitudinal bladder diameter (with ≥7 mm being abnormal) should be used to suspect LUTO. In the second trimester, imaging parameters of LUTO could include: a) an enlarged bladder, b) a keyhole sign, c) bladder wall thickening, d) bilateral hydro (uretero) nephrosis, and e) male sex. There was a lack of consensus on the current prognostic scoring literature. However, experts agreed on the value of amniotic fluid volume (< 24 weeks) to predict survival and that the value of fetal intervention is to improve neonatal survival. While experts endorsed the role of sonographic parameters of renal dysplasia, at least one vesicocentesis, and urine biochemistry for prognosis and counseling, these items did not reach a consensus for determining fetal intervention candidacy. On the other hand, imaging parameters suggestive of LUTO, absence of life‐limiting structural or genetic anomalies, gestational age of ≥16 weeks, and oligohydramnios defined as deepest vertical pocket (DVP) <2 cm should be used as candidacy criteria for fetal intervention based on experts’ consensus. If a bladder refill was evaluated, it should be assessed subjectively. Vesicoamniotic shunt should be the first line of fetal intervention. In the presence of suspected fetal renal failure, serial amnioinfusion should only be offered as an experimental procedure under research protocols. The core outcome set for future studies was agreed upon.ConclusionInternational consensus on the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of fetal LUTO, as well as the Core Outcome Set, should inform clinical care and research to optimize perinatal outcomes.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.