2020
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1801743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of an Item Bank for Drug Dependence Measurement Using Computer Adaptive Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that there is a deviation in the item when the variation in R 2 is greater than .02; then, it should be deleted (Choi et al, 2011). Referring to existing IRT-related and CAT-related studies (Gaynes et al, 2002; Liu et al, 2020; Tan et al, 2018), we selected two demographic variables, which have been the focus of DIF detection in these studies: region (rural, city) and gender (male, female). In this study, we conducted DIF analysis using the R package lordif (Version 0.3-3; Choi et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that there is a deviation in the item when the variation in R 2 is greater than .02; then, it should be deleted (Choi et al, 2011). Referring to existing IRT-related and CAT-related studies (Gaynes et al, 2002; Liu et al, 2020; Tan et al, 2018), we selected two demographic variables, which have been the focus of DIF detection in these studies: region (rural, city) and gender (male, female). In this study, we conducted DIF analysis using the R package lordif (Version 0.3-3; Choi et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smits et al (2011) and Yudien et al (2019) selected the first item that is most informative for the average latent trait score. In this study, we followed the approach of Liu et al (2020) and Magis and Barrada (2017) by randomly selecting the first item from the full DSQ for each participant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the CATs used a stopping rule that combined measurement precision and an upper limit of administered items (Butler et al, 2017; Flens et al, 2022; Liu et al, 2020; Smits et al, 2011; Yudien et al, 2019). Specifically, the CAT measurement was terminated when it reached a predefined SE of theta or the maximum length of administered items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations