Development and validation of an objective assessment scale for chest tube insertion under ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ rating

Ober, Julian; Haubruck, Patrick; Nickel, Felix; Walker, Tilman; Friedrich, Mirco; Müller‐Stich, Beat P.; Schmidmaier, Gerhard; Tanner, Michael C.

doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1430-9

Cited by 5 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is essential to promote interprofessional healthcare education and training [43]. Among the 19 studies in the systematic review, 14 only approached chest drain insertion techniques for physicians or medical students [4,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. None studied interdisciplinary work in drain insertion or chest drain care, and only 1 presented any protocol for teaching and training students in drainage [28].…”

Section: Interdisciplinary Action and The Quality Of The Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interdisciplinary teamwork for chest tube insertion and management: an integrative review

Ghazali¹,

Ilha-Schuelter²,

Barbosa³

et al. 2021

ait

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The importance of an interdisciplinary endeavour is the capacity of multiple professionals with different backgrounds working together to deliver higher quality care [1]. The concept of medicine as an isolated discipline concerned with the restoration of health has been replaced with the concept of different health professionals working together to maintain health [2]. This type of team-based learning can occur in either academic or clinical settings, during medical school and residency, and consist of any combination of professional groups [3]. Interdisciplinary collaboration in health care is crucial to offering patient-centred care, and working collaboratively is not only essential but also crucial in providing quality and safety in patient-centred care [2]. In the thoracostomy procedure, the physician/surgeon and nursing teams must work together to achieve patient care, sharing tasks and responsibilities [2].

show abstract

Section: Interdisciplinary Action and The Quality Of The Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interdisciplinary teamwork for chest tube insertion and management: an integrative review

Ghazali¹,

Ilha-Schuelter²,

Barbosa³

et al. 2021

ait

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, a study has reported low correlation coe cients (r < 0.33, p was all > 0.05) between on-site and off-site rating methods when assessing laparoscopy skills among residents [13]. Despite inconsistent ndings in previous research, averaging the off-site ratings of two (or more) evaluators may provide a solution to obtaining reliable results [12]. Apart from intraclass comparison, previous studies have also used validity tests to determine evidence for a strong correlation between total global scores and skill checklist scores from on-site observation in internal medicine education [14] and a moderate correlation for the off-site observation of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia [15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Thus, it is crucial to examine whether assessment tools developed for on-site use can be applied off-site to prepare for future practices. Previous studies have utilized off-site assessment of procedural skills among medical students and trainees [10][11][12][13]. An Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) was used to evaluate chest tube insertions off-site via video, with an acceptable degree of conformity between an average of two off-site and one on-site evaluation (intraclass correlation coe cient, ICC = 0.76) [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous studies have utilized off-site assessment of procedural skills among medical students and trainees [10][11][12][13]. An Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) was used to evaluate chest tube insertions off-site via video, with an acceptable degree of conformity between an average of two off-site and one on-site evaluation (intraclass correlation coe cient, ICC = 0.76) [12]. Video Observation of Procedural Skills (VOPS) was also established to evaluate senior residents' phacoemulsi cation performance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing knee joint mobilization skills of physical therapy students both on-site and off-site

Hou

Hsieh

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: There is a need to validate the reliability and validity of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) of knee joint mobilization for providing immediate feedback on the procedure. Additionally, it is crucial to examine whether the tools developed for on-site use can be applied off-site to prepare for future practice. The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation and clinimetric properties of a DOPS for knee joint mobilization evaluation (DOPSknee) on-site and off-site and to determine the pre-clinical competencies of physical therapy (PT) students at school. Methods: After the DOPSknee had been developed, 42 pre-clinical students from a single PT program were videotaped performing knee joint mobilization. Their performance was assessed in the standard manner by two clinical instructors using the DOPSknee. Assessments were conducted on-site and then off-site using the recorded videos after a time gap ranging from 1.5 months to 4.5 months. Results: The DOPSknee demonstrated a good level of on-site inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.78). It had a poor level of off-site inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.37) and a poor to good level of intra-rater reliability between on-site and off-site evaluations (evaluator 1: ICC = 0.42; evaluator 2: ICC = 0.88). However, the DOPSknee was shown to have good reliability average measures between the on-site and off-site evaluations (average on-site vs. average off-site: ICC = 0.84). Average total DOPSknee scores were significantly correlated with the average global rating scores on-site and off-site (r= 0.47 and 0.75) and in cross-over conditions (r = 0.54 and 0.71). The cut-off score for the DOPSkneewas determined to be 14 points, and the construct validity analysis of both on-site and off-site evaluations from the average DOPSknee total scores demonstrated that the average global rating scores of the students who passed were significantly higher (p< 0.05). Conclusions: The clinimetric properties of the DOPSknee protocol revealed generally good results for on-site validity and reliability in assessing student performance and a need to be interpreted and applied with care off-site. The average measures may help improve the results from the two evaluators.

show abstract

“…Following publication of the original article [1], the author reported that the given name and family name of all authors were swapped. The details are as follows:…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Correction to: Development and validation of an objective assessment scale for chest tube insertion under ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ rating

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development and validation of an objective assessment scale for chest tube insertion under ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ rating

Cited by 5 publications

References 38 publications

Interdisciplinary teamwork for chest tube insertion and management: an integrative review

Interdisciplinary teamwork for chest tube insertion and management: an integrative review

The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing knee joint mobilization skills of physical therapy students both on-site and off-site

Correction to: Development and validation of an objective assessment scale for chest tube insertion under ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ rating

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About