2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.03355-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of an In-House Database for Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry-Based Yeast Identification Using a Fast Protein Extraction Procedure

Abstract: In recent studies evaluating the usefulness of the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-based identification of yeasts for the routine diagnosis of fungal infections, preanalytical sample processing has emerged as a critical step for reliable MALDI-TOF MS outcomes, especially when the Bruker Daltonics Biotyper software was used. In addition, inadequate results often occurred due to discrepancies between the methods used for clinical testing and database co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies showed 88.7% (27) and 96% correct identification rates with a score of Ͼ1.7 (21), compared to 97.4% (29) and 97.9% (30) with a score of Ͼ1.8. The Bruker MALDI Biotyper system did not generate erroneous fungal identifications (10,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies showed 88.7% (27) and 96% correct identification rates with a score of Ͼ1.7 (21), compared to 97.4% (29) and 97.9% (30) with a score of Ͼ1.8. The Bruker MALDI Biotyper system did not generate erroneous fungal identifications (10,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with other identification methods, such as sequence analysis of the D1/D2 domains of the large subunit ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 and 2 regions of the rDNA, MALDI-TOF MS is able to provide accurate identifications of microorganisms with a short turnaround time (1,2). No major errors, such as genus-level misidentifications, have been reported in many MALDI-TOF MS-based studies on yeasts and filamentous fungi (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Most yeasts can easily be processed and correctly identified; even sibling species that cannot be distinguished with common biochemical methods can be discriminated with MALDI-TOF MS (12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aliquots from each positive BC bottle/broth were subjected to routine Gram staining microscopy and solid-medium subcultures. After isolation from the cultures, bacteria and yeasts were identified by MALDI BioTyper analysis; in cases in which the isolate could not be identified (i.e., ID score was Ͻ2.0), conventional phenotypical tests and/or sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene or the rpoB gene (for bacterial isolates) and the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1)-5.8S-ITS2 rRNA gene region (for fungal isolates) were performed as previously described (11,15,27). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the bacterial isolates was performed as part of the routine BC analyses with the Vitek 2 (bioMérieux) and/or Etest (bioMérieux), and interpreted according to EUCAST guidelines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VITEK MS system identified 96% of the isolates; the Biotyper system identified 91% of isolates. De Carolis et al created an in-house library using spectra from 156 reference and clinical yeast isolates, generated with a fast sample preparation procedure involving suspending a single colony of yeast in 50 L of 10% formic acid, vortex mixing, and using 1 L of the lysate for analysis (39 ). Using their database and processing, they identified 96% of 4232 routinely isolated yeasts using a specieslevel cutoff of Ն2.000 and the Biotyper system (software v3.0).…”
Section: Performance Of Maldi-tof Ms For Identification Of Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%