2017
DOI: 10.4038/cjms.v54i1.4821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of an instrument to measure informational needs of breast cancer patients in Sri Lanka

Abstract: Background: Breast cancer is the second most common cancer in the world and the commonest in Sri Lanka. The provision of relevant and accurate information in a social-culturally appropriate manner will lead to proper understanding of the disease and treatment options. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Sri Lankans' Informational Needs Assessment Questionnaire of Breast Cancer (SINAQ-BC). Methods: Item generation was through review of literature and using qualitative research tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaire was an interviewer-administered tool developed and validated to assess the information needs among patients with BC in the Sri Lankan settings. [ 9 ] It contained 58 items to assess information needs in five domains, namely disease, diagnosis, treatment, physical care, and psychosocial services. SINAQ-BC assessed the information needs by inquiring the study units to rate the importance of each item on a five-point scale of 1 (not important), 2 (slightly important), 3 (moderetly important), 4 (very important), and 5 (extremly important).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire was an interviewer-administered tool developed and validated to assess the information needs among patients with BC in the Sri Lankan settings. [ 9 ] It contained 58 items to assess information needs in five domains, namely disease, diagnosis, treatment, physical care, and psychosocial services. SINAQ-BC assessed the information needs by inquiring the study units to rate the importance of each item on a five-point scale of 1 (not important), 2 (slightly important), 3 (moderetly important), 4 (very important), and 5 (extremly important).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%