2020
DOI: 10.1534/g3.120.401343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of an Open Access SNP Array for Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Abstract: Tilapia are amongst the most important farmed fish species worldwide, and are fundamental for the food security of many developing countries. Several genetically improved Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) strains exist, such as the iconic Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (GIFT), and breeding programmes typically follow classical pedigree-based selection. The use of genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data can enable an understanding of the genetic architecture of economically important trait… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When evaluating the MAF across European seabass and gilthead seabream populations, the allele frequency profiles were similar within species, and did not vary significantly by origin (either wild or farmed) ( Fig S1). The mean MAF across the European seabass (0.33) and gilthead seabream (0.31) populations was higher than that reported when validating SNP arrays in Nile tilapia (0.29) and rainbow trout (0.25) [15,22]. However, the high average MAF observed in this study is most likely influenced by the fact that most of the discovery populations were also used for the validation of the SNP chip.…”
Section: Properties Of the Combined Species Medfish Snp Arraycontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When evaluating the MAF across European seabass and gilthead seabream populations, the allele frequency profiles were similar within species, and did not vary significantly by origin (either wild or farmed) ( Fig S1). The mean MAF across the European seabass (0.33) and gilthead seabream (0.31) populations was higher than that reported when validating SNP arrays in Nile tilapia (0.29) and rainbow trout (0.25) [15,22]. However, the high average MAF observed in this study is most likely influenced by the fact that most of the discovery populations were also used for the validation of the SNP chip.…”
Section: Properties Of the Combined Species Medfish Snp Arraycontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Substantial genomic tools have been developed for both species, including the assembly and characterization of highquality reference genomes [13,14]. Medium or high density SNP arrays have been developed for several other important finfish aquaculture species such as rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [15], Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) [16,17], catfish (Ictalurus furcatus and I. punctatus) [18,19], common carp (Cyprinus carpio) [20], Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) [21], and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) [22][23][24], which have been used for studies into population structure, genetic diversity, signatures of domestication, genetic architecture of traits of interest, and testing of genomic selection. A 57K SNP array was also recently developed for European sea bass [25] and has been applied to assess the genetic basis of resistance to viral nervous necrosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we need to acknowledge the fact that a low‐density genotyping approach was followed in our study which could limit our ability to discriminate between populations of low genetic distance. Therefore, high‐density genotyping approaches through the application of either more frequent cutting restriction enzymes or the recently developed open access tilapia SNP array (Peñaloza et al, 2020) could be of value for predicting with higher accuracy the population of origin even among closely related samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high polymorphic SNP rate (83.38%) was observed during the evaluation of NingXin-I in the wild and cultured large yellow croaker populations. Compared with the other aquaculture species, about 67.5% polymorphic SNPs were identified during the assessment of the 690K catfish array (Zeng et al, 2017); 64.5 and 86.0% polymorphic SNPs were identified in the 50K (Salem et al, 2018) and 57K (Palti et al, 2015) rainbow trout arrays, respectively, 74.0 and 83.4% polymorphic SNPs were identified in the 58K (Joshi et al, 2018) and 65K (Peñaloza et al, 2020) Nile tilapia arrays, respectively; 70.4% polymorphic SNPs were identified in the 190K Pacific oyster array (Qi et al, 2017); 74.6% polymorphic SNPs were identified in the 38K combined-species SNPs array for Pacific and European oysters (Gutierrez et al, 2017); 67.5% polymorphic SNPs were identified in the 9K Pacific white shrimp array (Jones et al, 2017); 70.6% polymorphic SNPs were identified in the 6K black tiger shrimp array (Baranski et al, 2014); 79.6% polymorphic SNPs were identified in the 200K Atlantic salmon array (Yáñez et al, 2016); 74.06% polymorphic SNPs were identified in the 250K common carp array (Xu et al, 2014); and 74.7% polymorphic SNPs were identified in the 50K Japanese flounder array (Zhou et al, 2020). The polymorphic SNP rate of NingXin-I (83.38%) is one of the highest among aquaculture SNP arrays, although others have achieved also a high polymorphism rate, such as rainbow trout with 86.0%, and Nile tilapia with 83.4%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%