Development and Validation of an Index to Measure the Quality of Facility-Based Labor and Delivery Care Processes in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

BackgroundHigh quality care is crucial in ensuring that women and newborns receive interventions that may prevent and treat birth-related complications. As facility deliveries increase in developing countries, there are concerns about service quality. Observation is the gold standard for clinical quality assessment, but existing observation-based measures of obstetric quality of care are lengthy and difficult to administer. There is a lack of consensus on quality indicators for routine intrapartum and immediate postpartum care, including essential newborn care. This study identified key dimensions of the quality of the process of intrapartum and immediate postpartum care (QoPIIPC) in facility deliveries and developed a quality assessment measure representing these dimensions.Methods and FindingsGlobal maternal and neonatal care experts identified key dimensions of QoPIIPC through a modified Delphi process. Experts also rated indicators of these dimensions from a comprehensive delivery observation checklist used in quality surveys in sub-Saharan African countries. Potential QoPIIPC indices were developed from combinations of highly-rated indicators. Face, content, and criterion validation of these indices was conducted using data from observations of 1,145 deliveries in Kenya, Madagascar, and Tanzania (including Zanzibar). A best-performing index was selected, composed of 20 indicators of intrapartum/immediate postpartum care, including essential newborn care. This index represented most dimensions of QoPIIPC and effectively discriminated between poorly and well-performed deliveries.ConclusionsAs facility deliveries increase and the global community pays greater attention to the role of care quality in achieving further maternal and newborn mortality reduction, the QoPIIPC index may be a valuable measure. This index complements and addresses gaps in currently used quality assessment tools. Further evaluation of index usability and reliability is needed. The availability of a streamlined, comprehensive, and validated index may enable ongoing and efficient observation-based assessment of care quality during labor and delivery in sub-Saharan Africa, facilitating targeted quality improvement.

Variation in competent and respectful delivery care in Kenya and Malawi: a retrospective analysis of national facility surveys

“…We used two previously validated indices of competent and respectful care to measure quality of labour and delivery care services. Tripathi and colleagues developed an index to assess the quality of the process of intrapartum and immediate postpartum care (QoPIIPC) in facility deliveries. This index is based on 20 process of care indicators available in the SPA related to the initial assessment and examination of the patient, the management of the first, second and third stages of labour and immediate newborn and postpartum care (Figure S1).…”

Using quality improvement to decrease birth asphyxia rates after ‘Helping Babies Breathe’ training in Kenya

“…Globally, facility deliveries are not associated with a subsequent reduction in perinatal mortality due to key quality gaps, including inadequate staffing, widespread use of inexperienced trainees as front line workers and overcrowded facilities (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”

Iniciativa para fortalecer la atención materna e infantil en un grupo de municipios en Colombia

“…La evidencia señala que es fundamental optimizar la recolección de indicadores útiles y generar herramientas que permitan interpretar fácilmente las situaciones encontradas y orientar las soluciones [27][28][29]. En este sentido, los ejercicios periódicos de monitoreo y seguimiento de indicadores, demostraron que prácticas clínicas clave como la valoración de riesgo obstétrico, signos de alarma, tamizaje de infecciosas, ecografía, y administración de micronutrientes, entre otras, se pueden mejorar si se realiza una retroalimentación adecuada y oportuna con los equipos clínicos y de gestión de las instituciones.…”