2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of brief scales to measure emotional and behavioural problems among Chinese adolescents

Abstract: ObjectivesTo develop and validate brief scales to measure common emotional and behavioural problems among adolescents in the examination-oriented education system and collectivistic culture of China.SettingMiddle schools in Hunan province.Participants5442 middle school students aged 11–19 years were sampled. 4727 valid questionnaires were collected and used for validation of the scales. The final sample included 2408 boys and 2319 girls.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe tools were assessed by the item … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depressive symptoms were evaluated using a Chinese depression scale adapted from the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale 23 . The Chinese depression scale used in our study was validated previously 24 , 25 . The cerebrospinal fluid pressure was estimated as already described 26 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depressive symptoms were evaluated using a Chinese depression scale adapted from the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale 23 . The Chinese depression scale used in our study was validated previously 24 , 25 . The cerebrospinal fluid pressure was estimated as already described 26 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items with discrimination parameters <0.5 were deleted as poor items. 31) Content Validity. Five stroke rehabilitation experts with a mean experience of 10.4 ± 6.1 years reviewed the items for content validity.…”
Section: Item Reduction and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anxiety and depression scores for each participant were obtained using the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS). Validation studies have demonstrated good acceptability, internal consistency and validity in the general population ( Shen et al. , 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%