2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of convolutional neural network-based model to predict the risk of sentinel or non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer: a machine learning study

Mingzhen Chen,
Chunli Kong,
Guihan Lin
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, unlike the neural network algorithm, the SVM model does not suffer from local minimum problems 51 . The excellent performance of SVM in various ML comparisons has also been verified 43 , 44 . A common challenge with many ML methods is that their predictions often lack interpretability, which may be due to their inherent black-box nature, such as with SVM 52 , 53 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, unlike the neural network algorithm, the SVM model does not suffer from local minimum problems 51 . The excellent performance of SVM in various ML comparisons has also been verified 43 , 44 . A common challenge with many ML methods is that their predictions often lack interpretability, which may be due to their inherent black-box nature, such as with SVM 52 , 53 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Together, these disciplines create a comprehensive understanding of disease from multiple levels of analysis. Previous studies have often only focused on single radiomics 41 , genomics 10 , or clinicopathological analysis 40 , but few studies have combined these three research methods to evaluate the ALN status and individualized medicine of BC patients In terms of the predictive ability of the model, the AUC of the multimodal model in this study is also excellent considering some other radiomics studies 42 44 and genomics studies 45 , although some of them combined clinicopathological analysis 46 . Although some researchers have reported associations between certain radiological features and genetic phenotypes 47 , medical imaging is still unlikely to fully reflect the microscopic characteristics of tumors, which was tested in the Durbin–Watson Test for the independence of rad-score, gene-score, and pathology ( P <0.95).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Compared to conventional diagnostic methods, diagnostic models using AI algorithms have the advantages of reproducibility, objectivity, and immediacy. Currently, ML and DL models based on medical imaging are being actively evaluated for the determination of LN status and are showing great potential (45)(46)(47). The summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curves of AI models for the prediction of LN metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best-performing CNN achieved 85% sensitivity and 73% specificity compared to the 73% sensitivity and 63% specificity of the radiologists [ 10 ]. Recently, Chen et al developed a CNN model to predict sentinel lymph node status based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [ 11 ]. Their CNN model showed the best performance in tumor groups smaller than 0.2cm with an AUC of 0.081 at the internal validation set and 0.823 at the external test set 1 [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Chen et al developed a CNN model to predict sentinel lymph node status based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [ 11 ]. Their CNN model showed the best performance in tumor groups smaller than 0.2cm with an AUC of 0.081 at the internal validation set and 0.823 at the external test set 1 [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%