2021
DOI: 10.1049/htl2.12009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of early warning score systems for COVID‐19 patients

Abstract: COVID‐19 is a major, urgent, and ongoing threat to global health. Globally more than 24 million have been infected and the disease has claimed more than a million lives as of November 2020. Predicting which patients will need respiratory support is important to guiding individual patient treatment and also to ensuring sufficient resources are available. The ability of six common Early Warning Scores (EWS) to identify respiratory deterioration defined as the need for advanced respiratory support (high‐flow nasa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the current study analyzed all data related to oxygen therapy at any given time point, which would have captured rapidly changing respiratory status of COVID-19 [ 26 ]. While preexisting scores, such as Respiratory Rate Oxygenation and National Early Warning Score, utilized clinical parameters only at defined time points, including on admission and/or a few days after admission [ 9 , 10 ], each patient in this study had detailed data with nearly 30 different time points. Third, several clinically valuable covariates were also obtained directly from the hospital information system and analyzed along with the changes in oxygen demand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the current study analyzed all data related to oxygen therapy at any given time point, which would have captured rapidly changing respiratory status of COVID-19 [ 26 ]. While preexisting scores, such as Respiratory Rate Oxygenation and National Early Warning Score, utilized clinical parameters only at defined time points, including on admission and/or a few days after admission [ 9 , 10 ], each patient in this study had detailed data with nearly 30 different time points. Third, several clinically valuable covariates were also obtained directly from the hospital information system and analyzed along with the changes in oxygen demand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since candidates for MV are usually on oxygen therapy and changes in respiratory status are frequently assessed within a day, estimation with such a long-term interval using a score is not practical. Moreover, although machine learning incorporating vital signs, laboratory data, and images could accurately calculate the risks for MV [ 7 , 10 ] it would be difficult for most health care facilities to adopt the complicated program without trained experts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 17 70 Others have used additional postadmission data in time-varying Cox models (for mortality and escalation), 18 19 which require knowledge of clinical information from the future and so should not be used for prediction. 21 Machine-learning models for mortality 20 and respiratory support 71 have also been reported to have good discrimination, although missing data are either discarded or imputed, which ignores the problem of informative missingness and may limit their applicability on an individual patient level. They also do not account for competing risks, for example, hospital discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 17 70 Others have used additional postadmission data in time-varying Cox models (for mortality and escalation), 18 19 which require knowledge of clinical information from the future and so should Open access not be used for prediction. 21 Machine-learning models for mortality 20 and respiratory support 71 have also been reported to have good discrimination, although missing data are either discarded or imputed, which ignores the problem of informative missingness and may limit their applicability on an individual patient level. They also do not account for competing risks, for example, hospital discharge.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%