2022
DOI: 10.1002/sscp.202100063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of liquid chromatography method for determination of Ibrutinib in finished dosage forms using quality by design approach

Abstract: A simple, precise, linear, robust, accurate, and stability‐indicating liquid chromatography method was developed and validated to determine Ibrutinib in finished solid dosage forms by reversed‐phase high‐performance liquid chromatography/photodiode array detector. Separation was achieved using a Luna C18 150 mm × 4.6 mm × 3.0 μm with a suitable mobile phase. The mobile phase: A consists of a 10 mM phosphate buffer concentration and 1 mL triethylamine, adjusted to pH 5.6 with a diluted orthophosphoric acid solu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forced degradation was conducted on both drug and placebo to check the interference and identify the degradants formed from the drug substance. The forced degradation was carried out by preparing the following samples and following conditions (Dongala et al, 2020; Ettaboina et al, 2022; Konduru et al, 2020; Konduru et al, 2022; Kowtharapu et al, 2022; Kowtharapu, Katari, Sandoval, et al, 2022a; Kowtharapu, Katari, Sandoval, et al, 2022b; Subramanian et al, 2021). All of the forced degradation samples were injected into the DAD detector to check the peak purity of the analyte and impurities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forced degradation was conducted on both drug and placebo to check the interference and identify the degradants formed from the drug substance. The forced degradation was carried out by preparing the following samples and following conditions (Dongala et al, 2020; Ettaboina et al, 2022; Konduru et al, 2020; Konduru et al, 2022; Kowtharapu et al, 2022; Kowtharapu, Katari, Sandoval, et al, 2022a; Kowtharapu, Katari, Sandoval, et al, 2022b; Subramanian et al, 2021). All of the forced degradation samples were injected into the DAD detector to check the peak purity of the analyte and impurities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QbD also designs a quality product that consistently delivers the intended performance. Similar principles and concepts have been adopted for analytical method development, termed ‘analytical QbD’ (Konduru et al, 2022; Kowtharapu et al, 2022; Liu et al, 2022; Subramanian et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experimental design constructed according to Quality by Design (QbD) can identify the individual effects as well as interactions of the critical method variables, such as the organic ratio, the pH of the buffer or mobile phase, the flow rate, the column oven temperature and the gradient composition (Konduru et al, 2020; Konduru et al, 2022; Kowtharapu, Katari, Ch, et al, 2022; Kowtharapu, Katari, Sandoval, et al, 2022). The current method robustness was studied utilizing the QbD‐based Design of Experiments with Design Expert software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%